First reviews for The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 1

The Twilight Saga Breaking Dawn Image This time next week The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 1 will be making a killing at the box office, but will Oscar winning writer Bill Condon (Dreamgirls, Gods and Monsters) be able to deliver the franchise with its first critical hit as director?

Here’s a summary of the first batch of reviews and reactions:

According to Movie Exclusive with Part 1 series screenwriter Melissa Rosenberg “makes the split right where it belongs” and Bill Condon “has taken the ‘Twilight’ franchise in a new and exciting direction” which is “easily the most emotionally satisfying of any of the films so far” and leaves “you with bated breath for the concluding film due one year later.” That’s where the glowing praise ends, though.

Screen Daily says Melissa Rosenberg “does a decent job of distilling some of the main conflicts from the 750-page novel” but thinks director Bill Condon is a “subpar director of spatial action”, citing a fight between the wolves and the Cullen clan that ends up being “a jumbled mess with a shrugging emotional impact.”

The Hollywood Reporter thinks splitting Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows into two films was justified given the “massive amount of narrative”, but thinks Breaking Dawn – Part 1 could have been covered in 40 minutes instead of two hours. The reviewer says the movie “feels both bloated and as anemic as Bella herself becomes while enduring her pregnancy.”

Variety says the movie is a “downgrade” from Eclipse action-wise and “two nocturnal wolves-vs.-vamps combat scenes are essentially thrill-free, and so underlit that one is inclined to suspect slapdash CGI”. Bill Condon “takes the reins capably enough” but “his approach suffers from a certain stylistic anonymity that seems endemic to the material.” The review suggests Breaking Dawn would have “benefited from a dash of Cronenbergian body-horror” and “a willingness to push past a PG-13 rating”, but that obviously wasn’t going to happen.

W.L. Swarts describes the acting of the three leads as “honed” but they deliver nothing new as “we’ve seen Kristen Stewart shake and look pained, we’ve seen Robert Pattinson look confused and we’ve seen Taylor Lautner look upset and strong.” The character of Bella also lacks development as she does “not become more sophisticated, more intuitive or more interesting, she is just pregnant.” Despite this Michael Sheen “resurfaces to remind viewers what a dramatic powerhouse he can be” as Volturi leader Aro and there is praise for the soundtrack which “is an actual special effect that helps tell the story”.

Plenty more reviews will be surfacing over the upcoming week, but it looks like it’ll get the same response as the previous films. The fans will love it and it’ll make millions, but critics and regular movie-goers will be left wondering what the hype is all about.

Around the web


  • Anonymous

    Who cares it’s for the fans ! None of these old men will get it.

    • http://itsmeknubs.blogspot.com/ Kangaroo Be Stoned

      The books are Mormanistic propaganda that perpetuates mass sexism and that the role of the woman is to be submissive and massively in love with someone. It’s obvious that the films would follow that vein. The near pedophilia nature is also disgusting, but you can’t tell that to the Twilight mothers who are currently pissed that their marriage isn’t what they hoped for.

      The blatant homophobia in the second film is disgusting too, when homosexuality is compared to a wolf who said “I WAS BORN THIS WAY!” We all know Meyers doesn’t believe that in regards to homosexuals.

      Do I not get it?

      • Trailblazer34

        Thank you…

  • Beth

    No one with any taste in decent films gets it

  • Leo_D

    These movies are for idiots, plain and simple. It’s the same reason why Kim Kardashian is famous, Michele Bachman is considered a serious presidential candidate by some and Two and a half men is a top rated show on tv. This world is over-run by morons, they will eat up anything that doesnt require deep, original concepts and insights.
    If you hate Twilight, which you should if you have half a brain, then consider yourself one of the few inspired, original, intelligent people in this world. More power to us.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TBCREZVZKW5PHICGY3FPQA46S4 Bry-pie

      have u read the books???!!!
      p.s im twihard242

    • Be happy

      Funny because i feel that is because of guys like you that twilight fans turn to this idiot movies. Get a life let the fans enjoy !!! find something that makes you happy!!! Mr. Im to smart to have fun.

      • Hunter

        Such a childish response… 

  • Hola

    Breaking Dawn – Part 1 could have been covered in 40 minutes instead of two hours….funny and true….they only do the splittin because of the—–>$$$$$$$$

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TBCREZVZKW5PHICGY3FPQA46S4 Bry-pie

      hav u read the books???
      p.s im twihard242

      • Hunter

        You don’t need to read them to know how crappy and non-eventful the story is. 

        • Unknown

          I did read them just to see what all the hype was about and now I know firsthand how crappy and non-eventful the story is.  And I was also incredibly frustrated by how poorly written they are…

  • twihard242

    i think maybe splitting them into to 2 was a good idea
    it keeps the fans going
    and can i just say if u havnt read the books dnt comment!!!

    • Imconnor

      *Twitard242

  • Pelikoan

    There are 7 billion people on this planet. Imagine if we all liked the same things. Wouldn’t that be boring?  Not every movie is made for everyone, so let the fans enjoy this saga without your negative comments.

  • Coronadorec

    Huzzah! Right on the money about all these movies. How awful are they? They can’t even get the titles right, a saga is a series of events that occur over decades, not even close to what these stinkers portray. Granted sitting through any of them feels like an eternity but that isn’t the same thing.

  • Twilover

    I read books, and watch movies to be entertained.  I really wonder how a movie critic even enjoys the movies.  I like a good love story and hate “stupid comedy”, which also seems to be popular.  From the amount of people that have seen the Twilight movies over and over again, the love stories win!  ’m pretty sure I won’t be disappointed.