Superman Reboot Confirmed. DC Getting Darker!

by Liam on August 22, 2008 · Comments

A few days ago it was reported that Man of Steel, the sequel to Superman Returns, was not going anywhere over at Warner Bros. Today we have a new development. Warner Bros. Pictures Group President Jeff Robinov told The Wall Street Journal that the studio is going to be reintroducing Superman.

Warner Bros. also put on hold plans for another movie starring multiple superheroes — known as “Batman vs. Superman” — after the $215 million “Superman Returns,” which had disappointing box-office returns, didn’t please executives. “‘Superman’ didn’t quite work as a film in the way that we wanted it to,” says Mr. Robinov. “It didn’t position the character the way he needed to be positioned.” “Had ‘Superman’ worked in 2006, we would have had a movie for Christmas of this year or 2009,” he adds. “But now the plan is just to reintroduce Superman without regard to a Batman and Superman movie at all.”

The article goes on to talk about other DC properties Warner Bros will be developing.

With “Batman vs. Superman” and “Justice League” stalled, Warner Bros. has quietly adopted Marvel’s model of releasing a single film for each character, and then using those movies and their sequels to build up to a multicharacter film. “Along those lines, we have been developing every DC character that we own,” Mr. Robinov says.

Like the recent Batman sequel — which has become the highest-grossing film of the year thus far — Mr. Robinov wants his next pack of superhero movies to be bathed in the same brooding tone as “The Dark Knight.” Creatively, he sees exploring the evil side to characters as the key to unlocking some of Warner Bros.’ DC properties. “We’re going to try to go dark to the extent that the characters allow it,” he says. That goes for the company’s Superman franchise as well.

The studio is set to announce its plans for future DC movies in the next month. For now, though, it is focused on releasing four comic-book films in the next three years, including a third Batman film, a new film reintroducing Superman, and two movies focusing on other DC Comics characters. Movies featuring Green Lantern, Flash, Green Arrow, and Wonder Woman are all in active development.

I didn’t see Superman Returns because it didn’t appeal to me, so I am up for Warner Bros rebooting Superman and making him darker, as that seems to be the way forward with comic book movies. The announcement that Wonder Woman, Green Lantern and the rest will also be dark is good news, although when I first read it I was rather disturbed that they are aiming for darkness with all of them. Does a comic book movie need to be dark, serious and depressing to be considered good?

(PS. It’s a good job Brandon Routh has managed to get other acting gigs, otherwise he would have been screwed)

(Cool Superman image from JPRart)

Bookmark and Share

Share with friends:



  • I enjoyed Returns but ultimately - yeah, it didn't leave me wanting more. It was like a homage to excellent Donner/Reeves era and we've seen all that before. No point in paying homage a second time.

    I like the idea of setting super hero movies in (close to) real world environments, much like the recent Batman's. Something similar for Superman could be a real Good Thing.
  • Kelly
    Its all good as long as Singer isnt involved.
  • Akshay
    I think michael bay should direct it.......anyways he was considered to direct superman returns........but singer clinched the deal last minute
  • You're right, it IS getting darker:

    http://www.screenjunkies.com/general/leaked-pic...
  • Steve Butler
    While Superman Returns may not have done as well at the box office as Warner Brothers would have liked, it was far better---storyline/screenplay--- than any of the previous Christopher Reeve efforts. Absolutely there were serious plot elements that were unnecessary and unneeded---Superman's son?---and the whole Lex Luthor/real estate storyline is tired and overdone but the picture as a whole was satisfying as a reintroduction to the character. Brian Singer's decision not to start completely over but pick up after Superman II was a good decision. Brandon Routh did an excellent job. And Kevin Spacey's Lex Luthor was far superior to the campy portrayal written for Gene Hackman.

    As far as the next "reboot" is concerned, I would be disappointed to see Brandon Routh replaced by someone with more "star quality." The Superman character and the film itself should sell the picture not the actor who is portraying him. I agree that "superhero" films in general need to be written to reflect a more serious or realistic tone, if that is what you mean by "darker," but Superman is NOT a dark character and Warner Brothers would be making a HUGE mistake to try and force him into that mold. The movie itself could be written more seriously, but Superman is a character of hope and light and definitely should not be re-created for film as a Batman type character just to satisfy some current movie genre trend.
  • xavier
    I absolutly Agreed on Steve Butler Comment.
  • Mbo
    I agree, Superman Returns was not a great film, but Brandon Routh is a great Superman.
  • sadisticon
    No, Superman Returns was no great shakes. And we don't need a brooding, somber Superman any more than we needed that weepy, overemotional one. The key is to remember his farmboy Methodist roots and power up a villain that's nasty enough and powerful enough to make us hate him and root for the big blue boy scout. His rogue's gallery ought to rock and sock but Hollywood is so brain dead from Disney and formula films it couldn't do jackshit with the potential inherent in this property. Thank Mrs Church I can read - at least I can still enjoy the comic book.
  • Justin
    THE NEW SUPERMAN MOVIE SHOULD FOCUS ON WHAT IT WOULD BE LIKE TO BE SUPERMAN. SUPERMAN RETURNS WAS A GOOD MOVIE, THE REASON IT DID NOT MEET EXPECTATIONS IS THAT NO NEW STORY LINE (WORTHWHILE AT LEAST) WAS INTRODUCED. THE ONLY THING NEW WAS THE STUPID IDEA OF SINGER AND HIS LITTLE "BUDDIES" TO MAKE SUPERMAN A DEAD-BEAT DAD. OTHERWISE I THINK IT WAS WELL DONE. THIS IS WHY BATMAN BEGINS WAS SO SUCCESSFULL AND WHY SMALLVILLE IS SUCCESSFUL, THEY SHOW WHAT LEAD UP TO "SUPERMAN". SO ITS TOO LATE FOR THAT NOW UNLESS THEY DO A PREQUEL.

    ONE GOOD IDEA WOULD BE TO DEAL WITH THE DAY TO DAY THINGS, LIKE HOW DOES SUPERMAN TAKE A DUMP? WHEN HE GOES TO THE CAN DOES HE HAVE TO HOLD BACK HIS PISS FOR FEAR OF TEARING UP THE TOILET?
blog comments powered by Disqus