New Terminator Salvation Concept Designs!

Terminator Salvation iPhone game due first week of may

http://www.iphonenewstracker.com/2009/04/24/previ...

Taken almost directly from wikipedia

fail!

You are all stupid. Scene 16 Terminator 2. Cyberdyne Systems model 101. Also known as T-101. He plays the same model terminator in Terminator and Judgement Day. Terminator 3, he is an 850 with a different fuel source, that makes active mobility longer but is the largest achillies heel for the robot, and what you will see in the fourth and fifth movie lead to the downfall of the machines rein.

And for those who still want to see the images, they're at my site:

http://piratecat.net/?p=248

actually he's called a 101 in the first two films... maybe you should watch them, retard

Crap, too late... they already removed the images! :P

BoredKal:
1)Why Pointless and inefficient to disguise the metallic robot to look like a human? Worked for the other three movies.
2)Hydrobot, how do you know they used the same metal? Its a 2-d picture. that could be a titanium alloy=VERY LIGHT
3)Have to agree with you there, the sheer mass of this robot using real-world physics would render this design virtually immobile. looks cool though, half the size and we've got a winner.
4)Mototerminator is probably one of the most practicle designs and would yield potentially devastating results, being extremely fast, maneuverable, and packing massive firepower by the looks of it.
5)So, once again, YOU FAIL.

don't you know how to use message boards. don't post twice just because the first one didn't show up immediately...

BoredKal

Of course the potential toy line came before the movie. It's Terminator 4 for God sakes. It's all about the money.

And yes, I second your dismay about the mototerminator. I couldn't think of a stupider character (name or design) if it was my job.

Reese explains the earlier attempts at infiltration units in The Terminator and how they were easily spotted due to their fake skin. It's already been explained that Skynet 'wasted' such time. Evidently this one has been spotted and taken some damage.

You did watch the first film, right?

Obvious things that jumped up and kicked me in the face about these...
1) The 600 would not have flesh like that. Skynet would not waste the time. It's pointless and inefficient. Someone fankwanking out a new enemy for a Quake or Doom game however... congratulations.
2) Hydrobot. Metal used for terminators = VERY HEAVY. If T:SCC has taught us anything, it would SINK.
3) Harvester. Yay for pointlessly huge and again unbelievably inefficient design. That thing is moronic and wouldn't look out of place in a dozen videogames.
4) Moterminator? Oh dear...
5) All of the above (bar the classic, wonderful HK) are clearly just there to give them some merchandise possibilities. Did the potential toyline actually come before the movie in this case?

*sigh* Why do they always feel the need to add some ridiculous looking additions to the known franchise for later sequels? "Mototerminator"? For God's sake.

@ the terminator

I take it you didn't see the "Hunter Killer"? Look at the article one more time.

and why are there no flying terminators?

also, wow Billy Hickle, a simple, 'yeah .3 you so right' would have sufficed

the human concept art looks similar to main character in bunji's marathon(2 and infinity). I'm just making an observation not complaining. It looks cool.

Billy Hickle you are hard core and screw those retards if they don't value your thoroughness. I for one am impressed and I don't impress easily. A society that belittles intellect and academic achievement and instead glorifies and elects mediocrity (I mean Bush not Obama) is a declining civilization indeed.

The Harvester of SORROW for sure.
I want one.

#6-Bill Hickle. you are fricking gay. Get a job, dude. Nerd.

Billy Hickle FTW!!

Cyberdyne Systems Model 101