<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>Filmonic &#187; Paul Rudd</title> <atom:link href="http://filmonic.com/tag/paul-rudd/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://filmonic.com</link> <description>Movie news, trailers, reviews and release dates</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:35:48 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Paramount decide against an Anchorman 2</title><link>http://filmonic.com/paramount-pass-anchorman-2</link> <comments>http://filmonic.com/paramount-pass-anchorman-2#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Adam McKay]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Anchorman 2]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Paul Rudd]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Steve Carell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Will Ferrell]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=9285</guid> <description><![CDATA[Earlier this week we heard from Anchorman director Adam McKay on his plans for Anchorman 2. He said that Steve Carell and Paul Rudd had agreed to cut their price, and they were now &#8220;talking to Paramount and trying to get the money to do it.” Well it seems McKay and Paramount have done some [...]<p>Read similar posts to <a href="http://filmonic.com/paramount-pass-anchorman-2">Paramount decide against an Anchorman 2</a> at <a href="http://filmonic.com">Filmonic</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  alt="Anchorman sequel " src="http://fcdn.filmonic.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Anchorman-sequel.jpg" class="aligncenter" width="500" height="252" title="Anchorman sequel" /><a href="http://filmonic.com/anchorman-2-could-start-filming-next-february-2011">Earlier this week</a> we heard from <strong>Anchorman </strong>director Adam McKay on his plans for <strong>Anchorman 2</strong>. He said that Steve Carell and Paul Rudd had agreed to cut their price, and they were now &#8220;talking to Paramount and trying to get the money to do it.” Well it seems McKay and Paramount have done some talking, but it didn&#8217;t go particularly well.</p><p><span id="more-9285"></span>From <a href="http://twitter.com/GhostPanther/status/13086799281">McKay&#8217;s Twitter</a>:</p><blockquote><p>So bummed. Paramount basically passed on Anchorman 2. Even after we cut our budget down. We tried.</p></blockquote><p>So <strong>Anchorman 2</strong> won&#8217;t be happening. That sucks.</p><p>The first film only made $90 million worldwide, which is probably why Paramount passed. Here&#8217;s what McKay had planned for the sequel:</p><blockquote><p>“[The '80s angle is] more the frame of it. We have this other, bigger, crazier idea that’s really more what it’s about, which I can’t say. Our thinking was there’s just no way the second one is going to be as good as the first, because the first one is the first one. So our idea is if we’re going to do a second one, we better go for it and try some insane stuff and we’ll be enjoying it and that way it can’t be half bad.”</p></blockquote><p>Read similar posts to <a href="http://filmonic.com/paramount-pass-anchorman-2">Paramount decide against an Anchorman 2</a> at <a href="http://filmonic.com">Filmonic</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://filmonic.com/paramount-pass-anchorman-2/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Anchorman 2 could start filming next February</title><link>http://filmonic.com/anchorman-2-could-start-filming-next-february-2011</link> <comments>http://filmonic.com/anchorman-2-could-start-filming-next-february-2011#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:57:11 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Adam McKay]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Anchorman 2]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Paul Rudd]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Steve Carell]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Will Ferrell]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=9256</guid> <description><![CDATA[Update: Paramount has decided against making an Anchorman 2. There has been talk of a sequel to Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy for a few years now, however one of the main issues preventing one from moving forward was getting the cast back together. Since the film was released back in 2004 both Paul [...]<p>Read similar posts to <a href="http://filmonic.com/anchorman-2-could-start-filming-next-february-2011">Anchorman 2 could start filming next February</a> at <a href="http://filmonic.com">Filmonic</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://filmonic.com/anchorman-2-could-start-filming-next-february-2011/anchorman-sequel" rel="attachment wp-att-9257"><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  src="http://fcdn.filmonic.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Anchorman-sequel.jpg" alt="Anchorman sequel " title="Anchorman sequel" width="500" height="252" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9257" /></a></p><p><strong>Update</strong>: <a href="http://filmonic.com/paramount-pass-anchorman-2">Paramount has decided against making an <strong>Anchorman 2</strong></a>.</p><p>There has been talk of a sequel to <strong>Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy</strong> for a few years now, however one of the main issues preventing one from moving forward was getting the cast back together.</p><p>Since the film was released back in 2004 both Paul Rudd and Steve Carell&#8217;s careers have soared and they are now headlining their own movies. Along with success comes higher salaries, and Paramount may have had second thoughts about paying millions to the main actors considering the first film only made $90 million at the box office. Although in a recent interview director Adam McKay spoke about the cast issue, and he revealed that it might not be much of an issue after all.</p><p><span id="more-9256"></span>From <a href="http://moviesblog.mtv.com/2010/04/27/anchorman-sequel-updat/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+mtvmoviesblog+%28MTV+Movies+Blog%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader">MTV</a>:</p><blockquote><p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a tricky movie because everyone went and did really well after it, so everyone&#8217;s prices went up and everyone&#8217;s time got a little more valuable. But at the same time, graciously, Steve and Paul and everyone agreed to cut their price to come and do [the sequel], which you don&#8217;t see very often in Hollywood — and cut their price substantially. But even with that, it&#8217;s just a budgetary thing with Paramount in terms of how much they&#8217;ll give us to make it.&#8221;</p><p>&#8220;We had an idea and we contacted Steve and Paul and [David] Koechner and Christina [Applegate] and checked in with everyone and they were all game for it,&#8221; McKay said. &#8220;The stage we&#8217;re at now is talking to Paramount and trying to get the money to do it.&#8221;</p></blockquote><p>McKay said that if all goes well then they can polish off the script later this year, and be ready to roll cameras by February 2011. He also hinted at the direction the sequel will be heading:</p><blockquote><p>&#8220;[The '80s angle is] more the frame of it. We have this other, bigger, crazier idea that&#8217;s really more what it&#8217;s about, which I can&#8217;t say. Our thinking was there&#8217;s just no way the second one is going to be as good as the first, because the first one is the first one. So our idea is if we&#8217;re going to do a second one, we better go for it and try some insane stuff and we&#8217;ll be enjoying it and that way it can&#8217;t be half bad.&#8221;</p></blockquote><p>Bigger, crazier, and more insane stuff sounds good to me. Do you want to see an <strong>Anchorman 2</strong>?</p><p>Read similar posts to <a href="http://filmonic.com/anchorman-2-could-start-filming-next-february-2011">Anchorman 2 could start filming next February</a> at <a href="http://filmonic.com">Filmonic</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://filmonic.com/anchorman-2-could-start-filming-next-february-2011/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Year One Super Bowl TV spot</title><link>http://filmonic.com/year-super-bowl-tv-spot</link> <comments>http://filmonic.com/year-super-bowl-tv-spot#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:11:41 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Movie News]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Jack Black]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Michael Cera]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Paul Rudd]]></category> <category><![CDATA[TV Spots]]></category> <category><![CDATA[Year One]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=4355</guid> <description><![CDATA[A lot of movie studios are using the Super Bowl to debut new footage from movies we haven&#8217;t even got trailers for yet, and that is the case with Year One. The rather funny TV spot features Jack Black, Michael Cera, Paul Rudd and David Cross having a confrontation over hunting bulls. When a couple [...]<p>Read similar posts to <a href="http://filmonic.com/year-super-bowl-tv-spot">Year One Super Bowl TV spot</a> at <a href="http://filmonic.com">Filmonic</a></p> ]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><img style=' display: block; margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto;'  src="http://fcdn.filmonic.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/year-one.jpg" alt="year one " title="year one" width="499" height="242" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4356" />A lot of movie studios are using the Super Bowl to debut new footage from movies we haven&#8217;t even got trailers for yet, and that is the case with <strong>Year One</strong>. The rather funny TV spot features Jack Black, Michael Cera, Paul Rudd and David Cross having a confrontation over hunting bulls.</p><p><object width="500" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kZAfu3wPTdE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kZAfu3wPTdE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x3a3a3a&#038;color2=0x999999" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="315"></embed></object></p><blockquote><p>When a couple of lazy hunter-gatherers (Jack Black and Michael Cera) are banished from their primitive village, they set off on an epic journey through the ancient world in Columbia Pictures&#8217; comedy &#8220;Year One.&#8221; Harold Ramis directs. The screenplay is by Harold Ramis &#038; Gene Stupnitsky &#038; Lee Eisenberg (&#8220;The Office&#8221;) from a story by Harold Ramis. The film is produced by Judd Apatow, Harold Ramis, and Clayton Townsend. In theaters June 19, 2009,</p></blockquote><p>Read similar posts to <a href="http://filmonic.com/year-super-bowl-tv-spot">Year One Super Bowl TV spot</a> at <a href="http://filmonic.com">Filmonic</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://filmonic.com/year-super-bowl-tv-spot/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/14 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk
Object Caching 560/581 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via fcdn.filmonic.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: filmonic.com @ 2012-02-13 13:43:35 -->
