After much anticipation, 20th Century Fox has finally released the full length trailer for Prometheus, first seen at a recent Q&A session with Ridley Scott and Damon Lindelof hosted by AMC Theatres. The newest trailer expands on the overall mystery, plot, and suffocating tension first seen in the teaser.

Without further ado, I give you the pure awesomeness known as the Prometheus trailer:

Visionary filmmaker Ridley Scott returns to the genre he helped define, creating an original science fiction epic set in the most dangerous corners of the universe. The film takes a team of scientists and explorers on a thrilling journey that will test their physical and mental limits and strand them on a distant world, where they will discover the answers to our most profound questions and to life’s ultimate mystery.

Prometheus stars Noomi Rapace, Michael Fassbender, Charlize Theron, Logan Marshall-Green, and Idris Elba, and 20th Century Fox will release the film on June 8th 2012.

Read similar posts to The full length Prometheus trailer has landed! on Filmonic

Ridley Scott has been working on his 3D alien prequels for a few years now. In April he stated that he’s just trying to get the first one sorted out at the moment, rather than work on both back-to-back, and they are looking towards getting a script ready for shooting having gone though around four drafts so far. Lost co-creator Damon Lindoff is currently working on that.

In a recent interview reflecting on his career with The Independent Scott spoke briefly about the films, and we also have word that the director may be meeting with an actress who goes by the name of Gemma Arterton for a role.

“The film will be really tough, really nasty. It’s the dark side of the moon. We are talking about gods and engineers. Engineers of space. And were the aliens designed as a form of biological warfare? Or biology that would go in and clean up a planet?”

In Ridley Scott’s original Alien, the cast came across the remains of a giant being with a hole in its chest (pictured above). Clearly these giants had come into contact with the xenomorphs beforehand, and fallen victim to their chest-bursting tendencies. The prequel will tell the story of these “Space Jockeys,” and their encounter with the aliens.

The Sunday Times (via The Playlist) interviewed Gemma Arterton (Clash of the Titans, Prince of Persia) and she revealed:

“Ridley Scott saw ‘Alice Creed’ and loved it. He wants me to meet for Aliens: The Remake, or something.”

Arterton has obviously not been keeping up to date with her sci-fi, but Scott will probably give her the run-down when/if they meet. Could Gemma Arterton be the next Sigourney Weaver/Ripley?

Read similar posts to Ridley Scott says Alien prequels will be “really nasty”, meeting with Gemma Arterton for a role on Filmonic

You’ll only have to look a few posts down to read the new details about the Alien prequel being developed by Ridley Scott.

Well Steve at Collider spoke to Ridley at a press junket for Robin Hood yesterday, and managed to squeeze a couple of extra details out of him. Most importantly, there will be two Alien prequels instead of one. Ridley stated that he’s just trying to get the first one sorted out at the moment, rather than work on both back-to-back. He refers to them simply as “prequel one” and “prequel two.” He doesn’t mention whether they’ll be part of the same story, or two different pre-Alien events. I wonder if they’ll both be about the Space Jockeys, or if that’ll just be the first one that’s currently on the fourth screenplay draft?

Ridley also confirmed that the prequels will “of course” be filmed in 3D. He talks more about the process of up-conversion to 3D in the full Collider article. He essentially dismisses the idea of 3Ding Blade Runner or any of his past films: “I’d rather save that energy for something new.”

As for me – I’m looking forward to these films, but the whole 3D thing is getting a bit tiresome. Aside from Coraline, and possibly Avatar, I haven’t seen a film in 3D that I wouldn’t have enjoyed just the same in 2D. Thankfully, my interest in more Alien from Ridley Scott far outweights this minor annoyance.

Additionally, sources for Shock Till You Drop say that the blu-ray Alien Anthology boxset, due out in the second half of the year, may include a “sneak peek” of the prequel(s). We might be seeing snippets sooner than I would’ve predicted.

Read similar posts to Ridley Scott planning two Alien prequels, both 3D on Filmonic

MTV conducted an interview yesterday with Ridley Scott, who unveiled a few details about the Alien prequel he’s currently working on. I’ll summarise the main information for those who don’t want to read the whole thing:

- Silencing any potential doubters, Ridley assures us that “There’s no question about it, we’re going to make the film.” They’ve gone through about four drafts of a script, with Scott now aiming towards something that can be shot.

- The film will be set in 2085 (approx. 30 years before Ripley is born – so no Sigourney Weaver!). In Ridley Scott’s original Alien, the cast come across the remains of a giant being with a hole in its chest (pictured above). Clearly these giants had come into contact with the xenomorphs beforehand, and fallen victim to their chest-bursting tendencies. The prequel will tell the story of these “Space Jockeys,” and their encounter with the aliens.

- Following the previous Alien movies, the protagonist will likely be female.

- The aliens will potentially undergo some design changes, in particular the face-hugger. Ridley may work together with H.R. Giger again, who designed the original alien back in the 1970s.

- Ridley aims for a late 2011 or 2012 release date.

While it might not be an integral piece of background, I think this could be very cool, and I’m intrigued to see the story of the Space Jockeys. It’ll be interesting to see a sci-fi horror in which the main characters aren’t human.

Read similar posts to Ridley Scott provides Alien prequel information on Filmonic

Back in July it was was announced that Sir Ridley Scott would be returning to the Alien franchise to direct an Alien prequel. His 1979 Alien movie spawned three sequels, however he wasn’t interested in directing any of them, which makes his return 30 years on quite intriguing.

Scott recently spoke to Empire and hinted at when it would take place and said he was looking forward to the prequel as it “is kind of interesting”:

“It’s a brand new box of tricks,” said Sir Ridley. “We know what the road map is, and the screenplay is now being put on paper. The prequel will be a while ago. It’s very difficult to put a year on Alien, but [for example] if Alien was towards the end of this century, then the prequel story will take place thirty years prior.”

“I never thought I’d look forward to a sequel,” said Sir Ridley. “But a prequel is kind of interesting. I’m looking forward to doing that.”

Read similar posts to Ridley Scott talks Alien prequel on Filmonic

We’re at a very precarious time in the history of mainstream cinema, the financial atmosphere of the world has forced the hand of the big studios into a strangling fist. I challenge anyone with the time to look over the releases schedule of the past two years and the upcoming releases into 2011 and not long for the early 90s when smaller studios were springing up to handle indie fare and genre films.

But we’re living in a belt-tightening world now, where the careers of studio executives depend on big movies with big budgets with big built-in audiences. That means a lot of adaptations from popular material, remakes and sequels. I don’t think I’m alone when I say that, in the constant battle of art vs. commerce, commerce has been kicking the living hell out of art for the latter half of the decade.

Which makes me sad for the visionary directors of the current period who are churning out independent films with vision. Releases from this year that come to mind: Duncan Jones’ Moon, Rian Johnson’s The Brothers Bloom and Marc Webb’s 500 Days of Summer. Johnson was coming off Brick, a well-received but wholly independent film. He managed to keep his butt in the driver’s seat for his sophomore effort. Jones made the most of his tiny budget to play on interior sci-fi claustrophobia and miniatures to show us the expansive landscapes of our natural satellite. Marc Webb came from the world of music videos to develop 500 Days of Summer into a visual style that would set it apart from the generic RomCom it could have easily become.

And it was the success of 500 Days of Summer as a debut film coming from a director of music videos that got me looking into one of my favorite art vs. commerce horror stories: the making of Alien 3.

Director David Fincher was best known for his commercial work at the time. He had started out shooting matte photography at ILM and even did some shots for Return Of The Jedi early on in his career. By the time he was brought into the Alien franchise, the third film was already in the midst of an identity crisis.

With the success of Aliens alerting 20th Century Fox to the franchise that had sprung up under their noses, the idea of “cracking” what made an Alien film unique was abound. Preliminary writers on the project wanted to distance themselves from the confined corridors and color-less palettes of the previous two films. Ridley Scott had made a gothic horror film and James Cameron had refocused the concept into a combat movie. Early drafts were Ripley-less as Sigourney Weaver was uninterested in rejoining the series. Two early drafts saw the aliens spread like an airborne virus with Hicks or other Marines forced to control it. A later draft seeded the idea of a prison planet or a prison ship, but when Vincent Ward (What Dreams May Come) was brought on as a director, he scrapped it all

Ward’s vision for Alien 3 saw Ripley returning to a wooden planet inhabited by Monks who lived mostly free of modern technology. The monks saw the introduction of Ripley as a test by their god and the arrival of the alien as intervention from the devil. As producers tightened the budgetary leash on Ward, he became frustrated and dropped out of the project, leaving producers Walter Hill and David Giler with the task of writing a script that would fit into Fox’s idea of how much an Alien movie should cost*.

Enter Fincher, who is hired as the director while Hill and Giler are mashing Ward’s story with the earlier prison planet draft. The film has already spent $7 million dollars in development and no script. The script wouldn’t be finished by the time Fincher started shooting.

[* Aside – I’m actually leaving out an interesting draft of Alien 3 by Larry Ferguson that Fincher later described like this: “In the draft Larry was writing, she was going to be this women who had fallen from the stars. In the end she dies, and there are seven monks left – seven dwarfs. Seriously. I swear to God. She was like….what’s her name in Peter Pan? She was like Wendy. And she would make up all these stories. And in the end, there were these seven dwarfs left, and there was this f*cking tube they put her in, and they were waiting for Prince Charming to come wake her up. So that was one of the endings we had for this movie. You can imagine what Joe Roth said when he heard this. “What?! What are they doing over there?! What the f*ck is going on?!”]

In a 1991 article written in the midst of re-shoots by John H. Richardson, Fincher seems keenly aware of just how screwed he was as a commercial director coming in to a film that already was suffering in the tug-of-war between creative and monetary interests:

Fincher: So what do you want to know about my movie?

Q: How you got involved, the production process, what happened in London. All that staff.

Fincher: Well, it’s weird, because when I got involved, it was, we have a movie to make. How do we solve these problems? How do we get this movie made? I’d love to just take the 50 million bucks and just f***in’ start over again.

Q: That’s worth talking about. Maybe we can save some young director…….

Fincher: What would you say? There’s no way a first-time director can make a $50 million movie in this town with the f***in’ recession on the eve of the millennium, you know, with the panic that exists in this business right now. There’s no way. You can’t do it, because in the end, if you can’t say, “I made Jaws, trust me,” why should they trust you? One time, (producer) David Giler, incredibly aggressive and p***ed off on a conference call with Fox, said, “Why are you listening to him for, he’s a shoe salesman!”.

Q: Meaning your Nike commercial.

Fincher: Exactly. And it’s perfectly valid. What do I know? I’m a shoe salesman.

When Fincher brought on Blade Runner’s DP, industry legend, Jordan Cronenweth, the studio said production was moving too slowly and forced Fincher to fire him. They told Fincher to film the dialogue scenes first and save the yet-to-be-written action scenes for later, then they cut the length of his shoot from 93 days to 70, they told him he could only have 25 visual effects shots, they told him he could only build half-sets and not the sets that he had brought to the project.

The film was shooting at Pinewood Studios in England and when the exchange rate shifted against the dollar, Fox sent over producer Jon Landua to wrangle the situation. Eventually, Landua called the production (in an poetic twist, 93 days into the shoot) and told Fincher he could cut the film together, then think about “reshoots.”

Q: What did you do when they pulled the plug?

Fincher: As upset as I was, I was so exhausted, I was glad to get back on the plane. We were told they were going to hold the sets until Joe Roth could take a look at the picture, but they decided it was more cost effective to cut the film and see exactly what was needed – what’s laughingly known as the surgical strike. So we assembled it – and it was like two hours and seventeen minutes – and we showed it to them. It was quite a sobering experience.

Q: I saw a list of your reshoots that was seven pages long.

Fincher: No, no. You must have seen the wish list…..

Q: So to this day there’s still a dispute over how to handle the ending?

Fincher: Oh, yeah. Absolutely. In my most depressed moments, people say, “You know, they didn’t know how they wanted to end Casablanca.” Hopefully this is Casablanca.

It wouldn’t be.

Alien 3 is far from a bad film, it’s just not an Alien film, really, and it lacks the unified vision and cohesion of a flick that has had the steady hand of a director guiding it through the production process.

However, as far as film revisionist history goes, 20th Century Fox wasn’t done screwing with Fincher.

For the definitive DVD box set, The Alien Quadrilogy, Fincher was asked to contribute his directors commentary to the film. He declined, meaning that Ridley Scott, James Cameron and Jean-Pierre Jeunet all got their commentary tracks and interviews for the documentaries on each film included in the package.

DVD producer Charles de Lauzirika was in charge of assembling the DVD package and – much to 20th Century Fox’s horror – submitted the third documentary titled: Wreckage and Rape: The Making of Alien³.

DVD review site Digital Bits reports:

More than thirty minutes of material that was produced for this documentary was cut at the last minute. You might be wondering what difference thirty minutes could make in a three hour documentary. A big difference. Gone now is much of the honesty and truth about the hell director David Fincher went through on the production. Among the footage lost were actual moments with Fincher on the set, where you saw his frustration and anger. You saw his struggles with producers. You heard from Sigourney and the other cast and crew members talking about the problems, and what a raw deal Fincher got. You even heard from the film’s producers and Fox executives talking about what went wrong. Simply put, this disc was about as good a behind-the-scenes look at the making of Alien³ as you could ever hope to get, short of Fincher returning to address the production himself (and he WAS asked to do so, but declined). Unfortunately, what you get now, while it still does contain some of the above (including material that you’ve never seen before), it sort of teases the stuff you really want to know, then glosses by it.

As a result of this drastic, studio-ordered cutting, Lauzirika took his name off the project, using a pseudonym in the DVD credits for the sixth disc.

What little information remains about Fincher’s horrible tribulations trying to make an artistic statement for his debut film resides in long forgotten interviews. Alien 3 ended up making money with its international release, spawning a fourth film written by Joss Whedon.

Fincher went on to direct Se7en.

Read similar posts to Art V. Commerce: David Fincher’s Alien 3 Nightmare on Filmonic