<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Star Trek fans call new Star Trek too &#8220;fun&#8221; and &#8220;watchable&#8221;</title> <atom:link href="http://filmonic.com/star-trek-fans-call-star-trek-fun-watchable/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://filmonic.com/star-trek-fans-call-star-trek-fun-watchable</link> <description>Movie news, trailers, reviews and release dates</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: Name</title><link>http://filmonic.com/star-trek-fans-call-star-trek-fun-watchable/comment-page-1#comment-11402</link> <dc:creator>Name</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:55:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=5697#comment-11402</guid> <description>... Chapel was not in all 3 original series. She was in the original series and that was it, and she was just a minor character. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are confusing Nurse Chapel with Lwaxana Troi, and possibly the ships computer. All of these characters were played by Majel Barrett-Roddenberry; Gene Roddenberry&#039;s wife.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; Chapel was not in all 3 original series. She was in the original series and that was it, and she was just a minor character.</p><p>You are confusing Nurse Chapel with Lwaxana Troi, and possibly the ships computer. All of these characters were played by Majel Barrett-Roddenberry; Gene Roddenberry&#39;s wife.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Name</title><link>http://filmonic.com/star-trek-fans-call-star-trek-fun-watchable/comment-page-1#comment-10326</link> <dc:creator>Name</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:55:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=5697#comment-10326</guid> <description>... Chapel was not in all 3 original series. She was in the original series and that was it, and she was just a minor character. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You are confusing Nurse Chapel with Lwaxana Troi, and possibly the ships computer. All of these characters were played by Majel Barrett-Roddenberry; Gene Roddenberry&#039;s wife.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; Chapel was not in all 3 original series. She was in the original series and that was it, and she was just a minor character.</p><p>You are confusing Nurse Chapel with Lwaxana Troi, and possibly the ships computer. All of these characters were played by Majel Barrett-Roddenberry; Gene Roddenberry&#39;s wife.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lighten Up</title><link>http://filmonic.com/star-trek-fans-call-star-trek-fun-watchable/comment-page-1#comment-7952</link> <dc:creator>Lighten Up</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:59:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=5697#comment-7952</guid> <description>And some people wonder why Trekkies are virgins. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And some people wonder why Trekkies are virgins.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lighten Up</title><link>http://filmonic.com/star-trek-fans-call-star-trek-fun-watchable/comment-page-1#comment-16506</link> <dc:creator>Lighten Up</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=5697#comment-16506</guid> <description>And some people wonder why Trekkies are virgins.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And some people wonder why Trekkies are virgins.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Bailey</title><link>http://filmonic.com/star-trek-fans-call-star-trek-fun-watchable/comment-page-1#comment-7945</link> <dc:creator>John Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 07:36:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=5697#comment-7945</guid> <description>Yet again the films ignore Yeoman Rand and Nurse Chapel. Rand in particular was very important at the beginning of the original Star Trek series - for christs sake she was the FOURTH most important cast member, until the actress was sacked back in 1966 - when she was assaulted by somebody high up in the studio&#039;s and got rid of to cover it up. Ignoring her character almost makes Paramount look like she never existed - yet they are happy to use more minor characters in the film?! Why. And Chapel appeared in all 3 original series. Their lack of appearence in the film is a joke. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet again the films ignore Yeoman Rand and Nurse Chapel. Rand in particular was very important at the beginning of the original Star Trek series &#8211; for christs sake she was the FOURTH most important cast member, until the actress was sacked back in 1966 &#8211; when she was assaulted by somebody high up in the studio&#039;s and got rid of to cover it up. Ignoring her character almost makes Paramount look like she never existed &#8211; yet they are happy to use more minor characters in the film?! Why. And Chapel appeared in all 3 original series. Their lack of appearence in the film is a joke.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Bailey</title><link>http://filmonic.com/star-trek-fans-call-star-trek-fun-watchable/comment-page-1#comment-16505</link> <dc:creator>John Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 07:36:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=5697#comment-16505</guid> <description>Yet again the films ignore Yeoman Rand and Nurse Chapel. Rand in particular was very important at the beginning of the original Star Trek series - for christs sake she was the FOURTH most important cast member, until the actress was sacked back in 1966 - when she was assaulted by somebody high up in the studio&#039;s and got rid of to cover it up. Ignoring her character almost makes Paramount look like she never existed - yet they are happy to use more minor characters in the film?! Why. And Chapel appeared in all 3 original series. Their lack of appearence in the film is a joke.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet again the films ignore Yeoman Rand and Nurse Chapel. Rand in particular was very important at the beginning of the original Star Trek series &#8211; for christs sake she was the FOURTH most important cast member, until the actress was sacked back in 1966 &#8211; when she was assaulted by somebody high up in the studio&#039;s and got rid of to cover it up. Ignoring her character almost makes Paramount look like she never existed &#8211; yet they are happy to use more minor characters in the film?! Why. And Chapel appeared in all 3 original series. Their lack of appearence in the film is a joke.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Liam</title><link>http://filmonic.com/star-trek-fans-call-star-trek-fun-watchable/comment-page-1#comment-7929</link> <dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 05:21:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=5697#comment-7929</guid> <description>I&#039;m glad you enjoyed it! Hopefully i&#039;ll be seeing it at the weekend. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m glad you enjoyed it! Hopefully i&#39;ll be seeing it at the weekend.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Liam</title><link>http://filmonic.com/star-trek-fans-call-star-trek-fun-watchable/comment-page-1#comment-16504</link> <dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 05:21:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=5697#comment-16504</guid> <description>I&#039;m glad you enjoyed it! Hopefully i&#039;ll be seeing it at the weekend.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m glad you enjoyed it! Hopefully i&#039;ll be seeing it at the weekend.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: StevooGer</title><link>http://filmonic.com/star-trek-fans-call-star-trek-fun-watchable/comment-page-1#comment-7922</link> <dc:creator>StevooGer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:02:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=5697#comment-7922</guid> <description>Just came from cinema...thought it was fucking awesome!! Really loved it :D </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just came from cinema&#8230;thought it was fucking awesome!!<br /> Really loved it :D</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: StevooGer</title><link>http://filmonic.com/star-trek-fans-call-star-trek-fun-watchable/comment-page-1#comment-16503</link> <dc:creator>StevooGer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=5697#comment-16503</guid> <description>Just came from cinema...thought it was fucking awesome!! Really loved it :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just came from cinema&#8230;thought it was fucking awesome!!<br /> Really loved it :D</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 6/18 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk
Object Caching 416/420 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via fcdn.filmonic.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: filmonic.com @ 2012-05-26 15:47:19 -->
