Sam Raimi still deciding Spider-Man 4 villain. Wants Dunst to return.

by Liam on March 16, 2009 · Comments

spider-man_4IGN caught up with Spider-Man director Sam Raimi today at the SXSW Film Festival to discuss his new horror film Drag Me to Hell, and while chatting with the director they slipped in a couple of questions about Spider-Man 4.

According to Raimi, he has yet to decide on the villain for Spider-Man 4, though he has firmer plans for the film’s love interest.

“Right now, I’m working with the production team,” he explained. “I’m in the earliest stages of working with the writer, trying to work out a story.”

He added, “We’re closing in on Spider-Man’s adversary or adversaries… but I think Sony is going to want to release the Spider-Man announcements themselves.”

When asked if Mary Jane Watson or Gwen Stacy would take centre stage in terms of romance, Raimi was a little more forthcoming.

“I’m hoping that Kirsten [Dunst, who plays Mary-Jane] will be in it, but we’re still talking about that,” he revealed. “Definitely, she’s got to be in it. It wouldn’t be the Spider-Man series without her.”

Sony recently announced that we will be seeing Spider-Man 4 in May 2011, so Raimi has at least a year to get everything sorted. I got the feeling they introduced Gwen Stacy in Spider-Man 3 to spice things up a bit. Maybe they could makes things even more interesting by adding a character that could be both a love interest and a villain. *cough* Black Cat *cough*

Bookmark and Share

Share with friends:



  • Lockdown
    It´s absolutely important that Kirsten Dunst should be in Spider-Man 4. Without her as Mary Jane then it´s not fully a Spider-Man movie.
  • Well hope the "love" thingie doesnt become so over the top ridiculous as in Spiderman 3, but im looking forward to it...got a good feeling :)
  • ewwwwwww
    hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
  • rightone
    i think they should continue the venom story. make venom put parker thru so much
  • Derek
    The third Spider-man movie was completely worthless. First of all, Spider-man should focus more on action than romance. Secondly, and most important of all, you can't take a villain as popular as VENOM, and throw him into the last five minutes of the movie only to kill him off. That would be like taking the JOKER from Batman and only including him in the Dark Knight film as much as they did Two Face (Harvey Dent), which was also a somewhat disappointing move, but still Two Face is not as popular as the Joker. And besides, who's idea was it to make Sandman the pinnacle villain. Honestly, he is such a worthless and unimportant character to the Spider-man series. Pick Mysterio, Shocker, Vulture, or practically any other villain. They'll probably ruin the fourth Spider-man by making Carnage the villain now that they feel Venom played enough of a part.
  • Max
    Yeah, Spider-man 1 did a good job with Green Goblin, Doctor Octopus was fairly decent with Spider-man 2, then they totally screwed up Venom in the third. Made him a scrawny little screeching guy who always took off his mask. Not too mention he was barely in it. Probably right about the Carnage thing. Carnage is nowhere near as cool as Venom.
blog comments powered by Disqus