<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: RoboCop Poster Revealed!</title> <atom:link href="http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed</link> <description>Molesting Your Film Shaft!</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:19:30 -0800</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: No Robocop till 2011 &#124; Filmonic</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-8655</link> <dc:creator>No Robocop till 2011 &#124; Filmonic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-8655</guid> <description>[...] Aronofsky&#8217;s Robocop reboot for months now and it&#8217;s been exactly one year since the first poster was revealed. So what&#8217;s going on? Well io9 got a little curious after an announcement of a new Robocop [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Aronofsky&#8217;s Robocop reboot for months now and it&#8217;s been exactly one year since the first poster was revealed. So what&#8217;s going on? Well io9 got a little curious after an announcement of a new Robocop [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ArColone</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-8498</link> <dc:creator>ArColone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:38:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-8498</guid> <description>Robocop is a classic. The first part was great. Two was o.k. and the rest sucked. i agree with patrick. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robocop is a classic. The first part was great. Two was o.k. and the rest sucked. i agree with patrick.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Patrick</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-6742</link> <dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:50:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-6742</guid> <description>Im looking forward to seeing it. I just hope they dont fuck it up </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im looking forward to seeing it. I just hope they dont fuck it up</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zel8339816</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-8814</link> <dc:creator>Zel8339816</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:57:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-8814</guid> <description>Well I guess that really depends on whether the actor fits in the suit or not.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I guess that really depends on whether the actor fits in the suit or not.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nobody</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-8813</link> <dc:creator>Nobody</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:33:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-8813</guid> <description>Cronenberg was slated for the part...I think Robocop is a classic and is was a shame they did 2 &amp; I think 3 and so on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would pay $100 or more to see a version done by Cronenberg.  I believe he already has a few script versions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cronenberg was slated for the part&#8230;I think Robocop is a classic and is was a shame they did 2 &#038; I think 3 and so on.</p><p>I would pay $100 or more to see a version done by Cronenberg.  I believe he already has a few script versions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Goose</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-8812</link> <dc:creator>Goose</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 18:31:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-8812</guid> <description>The first one was a product of the 80&#039;s and is accepted for what it is.. violent fun of the time. Now.. I am not sure I want to see a remake. I don&#039;t want it over hyped with CGI and I don&#039;t want it dumbed down for a PG-13.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first one was a product of the 80&#39;s and is accepted for what it is.. violent fun of the time. Now.. I am not sure I want to see a remake. I don&#39;t want it over hyped with CGI and I don&#39;t want it dumbed down for a PG-13.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss><!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache:

W3 Total Cache improves the user experience of your blog by caching
frequent operations, reducing the weight of various files and providing
transparent content delivery network integration.

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk
Database Caching 0/15 queries in 0.028 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.filmonic.com @ 2009-11-21 10:55:38 -->