<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: RoboCop Poster Revealed!</title> <atom:link href="http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed</link> <description>Movie news, trailers, reviews and release dates</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Stu</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-17867</link> <dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 01:02:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-17867</guid> <description>If it&#039;s Cronenberg - yes. Otherwise, I am really not interested in seeing it remade. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s Cronenberg &#8211; yes. Otherwise, I am really not interested in seeing it remade.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: No Robocop till 2011 &#124; Filmonic</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-8655</link> <dc:creator>No Robocop till 2011 &#124; Filmonic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-8655</guid> <description>[...] Aronofsky&#8217;s Robocop reboot for months now and it&#8217;s been exactly one year since the first poster was revealed. So what&#8217;s going on? Well io9 got a little curious after an announcement of a new Robocop [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Aronofsky&#8217;s Robocop reboot for months now and it&#8217;s been exactly one year since the first poster was revealed. So what&#8217;s going on? Well io9 got a little curious after an announcement of a new Robocop [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ArColone</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-8498</link> <dc:creator>ArColone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:38:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-8498</guid> <description>Robocop is a classic. The first part was great. Two was o.k. and the rest sucked. i agree with patrick. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robocop is a classic. The first part was great. Two was o.k. and the rest sucked. i agree with patrick.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ArColone</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-14628</link> <dc:creator>ArColone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 07:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-14628</guid> <description>Robocop is a classic. The first part was great. Two was o.k. and the rest sucked. i agree with patrick.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robocop is a classic. The first part was great. Two was o.k. and the rest sucked. i agree with patrick.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Patrick</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-6742</link> <dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:50:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-6742</guid> <description>Im looking forward to seeing it. I just hope they dont fuck it up </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im looking forward to seeing it. I just hope they dont fuck it up</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Patrick</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-14627</link> <dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:50:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-14627</guid> <description>Im looking forward to seeing it. I just hope they dont fuck it up</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im looking forward to seeing it. I just hope they dont fuck it up</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zel8339816</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-11207</link> <dc:creator>Zel8339816</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:57:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-11207</guid> <description>Well I guess that really depends on whether the actor fits in the suit or not.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I guess that really depends on whether the actor fits in the suit or not.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nobody</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-11206</link> <dc:creator>Nobody</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 05:33:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-11206</guid> <description>Cronenberg was slated for the part...I think Robocop is a classic and is was a shame they did 2 &amp; I think 3 and so on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would pay $100 or more to see a version done by Cronenberg.  I believe he already has a few script versions.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cronenberg was slated for the part&#8230;I think Robocop is a classic and is was a shame they did 2 &#038; I think 3 and so on.</p><p>I would pay $100 or more to see a version done by Cronenberg.  I believe he already has a few script versions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Goose</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-11205</link> <dc:creator>Goose</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:31:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-11205</guid> <description>The first one was a product of the 80&#039;s and is accepted for what it is.. violent fun of the time. Now.. I am not sure I want to see a remake. I don&#039;t want it over hyped with CGI and I don&#039;t want it dumbed down for a PG-13.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first one was a product of the 80&#39;s and is accepted for what it is.. violent fun of the time. Now.. I am not sure I want to see a remake. I don&#39;t want it over hyped with CGI and I don&#39;t want it dumbed down for a PG-13.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zel8339816</title><link>http://filmonic.com/robocop-poster-revealed/comment-page-1#comment-8814</link> <dc:creator>Zel8339816</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:57:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=1779#comment-8814</guid> <description>Well I guess that really depends on whether the actor fits in the suit or not.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I guess that really depends on whether the actor fits in the suit or not.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/17 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk
Object Caching 387/391 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via fcdn.filmonic.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: filmonic.com @ 2012-02-13 15:42:30 -->
