Review: Inception

by Jack on July 19, 2010 · 21 comments

inception film

At the time of writing, Inception has already shot up to the number 3 spot on IMDb’s top 250 list, having only been out for a few days. After the creation of his new Batman universe (and particularly The Dark Knight), Christopher Nolan has been touted as a filmmaking genius, and Inception has already been called his “best film yet” by many. So is it deserving of the hype?

To be quite frank, no. I went into the movie without having read any reviews, but having seen a couple of scores: mostly 10/10s and 5/5s. And after watching it for myself…unfortunately I don’t really understand these scores.

I’d kept “clean” with regards to Inception; I only watched that first teaser that came out last year, and I loved it. It was enough to create an enormous level of excitement, while still keeping a huge shroud of mystery. The surreal use of physics and mysterious sci-fi plot were really intriguing, coupled with the fact that Christopher Nolan has already directed some great films with twisty plots. Despite the fact that I was disappointed by The Dark Knight, this was all enough to get me really, really, really excited.

I was let down. The film’s opening quarter (or thereabouts) is cool. The first sequence in particular is pretty exciting and contains its own fascinating little twists, that help to get you into the movie’s main ideas. The introductions to these dream-related concepts like “architects” and “forgers,” and of course “inception” itself, are all really great. The ideas behind the film are brilliant, and could have led to a mind-bending sci-fi thriller. But unfortunately the rest of the film comes up short.

Some reviewers seem to think that Inception is full of many philosophical and intellectual matters, and that it could resultantly be studied for hours on end. But this wasn’t the case – to me it just seemed like an action-thriller with a few more layers thrown in. The plot isn’t very twisty or confusing, being just a little more complex than the average sci-fi or action movie. It’s not hard to follow at all.

If you don’t want to know the plot of the movie (like I didn’t), don’t read the following paragraph. If you don’t mind, then go ahead, I won’t tell you too much:

DiCaprio & co. can go into people’s minds and appear in their dreams. In order to get to see his family again, DiCaprio strikes a deal with a rich guy (Ken Watanabe) in which he will try to commit “inception,” the near-impossible act of planting an idea in to someone’s mind, as opposed to taking it out. He then assembles a gang of cohorts with different dream-manipulating abilities, in order to carry out the act. It’s a heist-type thing, and that’s about it. The plot means that the movie’s second half devolves into shallow action; a lot of shooting and a lot of loud music. It finishes as a reasonably simple action movie. At this point I was just wishing things would hurry up and something would actually happen.

And regarding the end (but not really spoiling it…I’ll hide it anyway):

There is a little “twist” left in the very final shot of the movie, which seems to be causing some debate among viewers. But the film had dragged on so much that by this time, I wasn’t too bothered what it meant.

The cast contains some great actors, but none of them really get to flex their theatrical muscles. Well-known stars like Leonardo DiCaprio and Ken Watanabe play their roles just fine. They do the job (Joseph Gordon-Levitt maybe stood out a little more than the rest). But nobody brings anything special to the table, and I didn’t particularly sympathise with anyone, or care about them. The characters just weren’t very interesting (even with the “personal troubles” present in DiCaprio’s character). It was all rather neutral. I’m surprised Michael Caine was even listed on the posters, as he only appears for a few seconds, and it almost seems like he took the role just to get out of the house for a bit. And to be honest, the best thing about the cast was Ellen Page being hot. Don’t worry though, I’m not usually that shallow – there just wasn’t much else that caught my attention.

As a final thought that I noticed while watching: the idea of having a movie mostly take place inside people’s dreams gives way to a vast array of surreal environments and such. Inception doesn’t fully engage with this potential, and the CGI work isn’t as stunning as it could have been. It ends up disappointing on both visual and storytelling fronts; the imagination could have been stretched further. The concepts seem complicated and deep in theory, but they are not executed in a way that makes for a thrilling movie. I’m worried that many will over-appreciate / overhype this movie simply due to the fact that they are attached to the director and his 2008 splash.

In my humble opinion, Inception doesn’t come close to being Nolan’s “best film.” The Prestige is at the top of my Nolan list, and is one of my favourite films of all time. Batman Begins is one of the best comic book movies that have been made (despite being a set-up for a sequel). And while I didn’t think The Dark Knight was great, I actually liked it more than Inception. So in summary, I was pretty much disappointed by this movie, which is a great shame, because it was my most anticipated film of the year. I wanted it to come along and blast all the other crappy movies out of the water, but it’s not a masterpiece, and it isn’t really genius. It’s some awesome ideas that are hidden behind mostly-uninteresting characters, and a plot that isn’t very exciting.

6.5/10

P.S. Tron: Legacy looks fricking amazing. The trailer that was screened before Inception was the best part of the experience. Just felt I had to add that.

[Editor's note: Personally i'd give it an 8 or 9 and thought it was great]

  • MrE

    Sorry to say, but poorly written article. “It's a heist-type thing”, really? I usually expect more from you guys. THAT felt longer than Inception, which I thought was awesome. My different reaction to the movie isn't why I say the article was weak, it just was. I won't go into the numerous reasons this movie was exceptional, but to say it's just another action-thriller is just plain silly. This movie was an absolute Eye-Gasm that made you think at the same time. When's the last time a movie like that came around? The Matrix? I remember that being pretty revolutionary for it's time. Anyways I'd give the movie a solid 8.5 out of ten. So ya missed there….Oh and Nolan's top 5 films? You destroyed that one. From 5 to 1. Batman Begins, The Prestige, Memento, Inception, The Dark Knight…That is final.

  • Zac

    Hey Jack. I think you are being unfair in your review. If you didn't like it that's cool, but I think the reasons why are because YOU didn't get the movie YOU wanted. (Which is fair from a personal stand-point, but not as a reviewer perhaps?)

    I would recommend you give it another try. I think trying to bend this movie to the genre of movie you want is unfair. Don't look at it as Sci-Fi, or Thriller, or Heist, ect. This is a movie that's depth explorers not only one genre, but rather human emotion and thinking as a whole.

    Either way I'm sorry you were disappointed. I hope if you seen it again you will enjoy it more!

  • vfxfan

    Seems you went in with some pre-conceived notions there or was just determined not to like it just because. I'm all for respecting others opinions, but not when they're just plain wrong.

  • Anonymous

    An amateur movie critic wanting to stand out by giving a bad review. typical. never wanting to follow the crowd no matter how great a film is. grow up

  • ManOWar

    An anonymous poster believing that this movie is nothing but a gem to everyone, and therefore, the source of the bad review must be a bad reviewer. No, I believe a movie could be bad and this was no more than a 1/4 action, physicology, drama and CGI… too bad it wasn't able to use any of them at 100%.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Misty-McClure/45108568 Misty McClure

    Not Anonymous's fault if he doesn't want to be singled out.
    And this review didn't give one example of why it was bad. It was filled with dubious ideas of why it was bad. How was this just an action movie “with a couple more layers thrown in?” How are the actors not stretching their theatrical muscles? For me, this was the first time I've seen Marion Cottilard as a slightly villainous character, and I thought she did very well. What's wrong with the execution of the “deep, philosophical ideas?”
    This review is filled with many vague notions of why the movie is bad, but no solid illustrations. If you don't like it, be specific as to why.

    Oh, and when you compare yourself to the critics who give it 5/5-10/10, or critics who remark that this movie “is full of many philosophical and intellectual matters, and that it could resultantly be studied for hours on end,” it makes you sound exactly like someone who's saying he doesn't like it just because everyone else does.

  • apol

    Sorry about what im going to say because i always respect other opinions, but this one is so unfair. Im with MrE. you just didn't got what you were expecting. Sometimes, expecting something to much it makes your “Enjoy Vision” so blurry that you cannot be surprised anymore and thats a shame. I already watch the movie and i love it. i give it a 9 of 10. Perhaps you should relax your “pen” a little bit dont you think?.

  • http://www.facebook.com/barry.stephens Barry Stephens

    He's totally right. I really wanted it to be good, too. I've never not watched a preview for a film until Inception, but this was something I was hoping for.
    There were elements that were spectacular, other elements, like the music that NEVER LET UP, made me feel like I was watching the last 15 minutes of a suspense/thriller over and over again, but it forced me to think that EVERY SENTENCE had purpose. Alas.
    It feels like Nolan was rushing to make this movie. His pacing is a talent in other films and was lost here in his attempt to do too much. He essentially did two films at once, one a good action film with empty characters and the other, a weak love drama with disposable characters.
    Just because it was about dreams it appeals to half-wits who think there's something to be understood, when the only mysteries of the film are plot holes, deliberately placed to screw with people…. er, I mean… have great purpose and meaning. The people that love this film are the same I could see flocking to see a potato chip with the shape of Jesus' face. There's nothing there, but gush all you like.
    I like that Gordon-Levitt is getting more roles, but all I could see from him in this film was a Keanu Reeves doppelganger. He was still one of my favorite characters. .
    I've had this discussion with everyone that's watched Inception.
    It's The Matrix meets Crank
    You've all been had. Get some standards.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Misty-McClure/45108568 Misty McClure

    Wow Barry. Seriously? Did someone knock on your door and call you a half-wit because you liked a movie? You can have your opinions, there's no need to be insulting about it.
    And please, can you give me an example of a plot hole in this film?

  • MrE

    So far the negative comments I've heard about this film have been
    1. Too slow 2. Too slow paced
    3. Too complex 4. Tries to appear complex while remaining average
    5. Characters aren't developed enough….usually in the same article where the acting is applauded
    and 6. That everyone else loves it!!! That's seriously a gripe I've read in a few reviews. Film critics are literally resorting to the “everyone loves it so I guess I'll hate it” card. Sad really. It seems as if people are searching so strongly for things to dislike about the movie that they're arguing with themselves.
    The truth is that the films pacing is spot on. The end sequences of things moving in slow or extreme slow motion, is automatically transposed against fast moving, frantic scenes which I would think would keep people from bitching about the movie being one or the other.
    The beauty about this film is that it is EXTREMELY complex, but the story is told in such a way that even morons can keep up without having to have their hands held through the process.
    Thirdly, the cast is nearly perfect. Really getting tired of Ellen Page playing the smart-ellicy, quick with a comeback girl in movies. Besides that Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Tom Hardy are tremendous alongside Leo. One person I haven't read much about is Cilian Murphy. Many people find Leo's love story to be the central emotional tone of the movie, but I feel that it's the relationship between Murphy's character Fischer and his father.
    Murphy plays his character with just the right amount of reserved sadness and spiteful indignation that makes you connect with him when another actor may have only made him “the mark” whom you may just root against through the whole film.
    And I reworked my Christopher Nolan top 5 list…switch The Prestige to 5th and Batman Begins to 4th.

  • Justin

    Honestly, I couldn't have expected a different review coming from someone who didn't like the Dark Knight. In a way seems biased to me, but whatever, it's your opinion.

    I honestly loved the movie, and it's definately a Top Five Movie of all time for me, it kept me on the edge of my seat most of the movie, and in an eerie way was very enjoyable. I don't think I've ever gotten the chills as many times as I did watching that movie. And CGI and whatnot not being good? I thought it was some of the best I'd ever seen….anyways, in my opinion it was a great movie, but we all have different opinions I guess, so it's all good.

  • http://www.cadillacpilates.com Susan

    IMO, Inception is one of the best movie of the summer, tied with Toy Story 3.

  • MrE

    BTW…Ellen Page is NOT HOT!!! She's got a 5-head(which is bigger than a regular sized forehead, in case you'd never heard the term) and she's built like a 14 year old boy with shoulders that look twice as wide as her hips. What is she? 4'11″?

    There was a scene in Hard Candy where she lifted her shirt up and she had a six-pack and I thought…hmmm…maybe she can be hot. Now she's legal and doing LESS for me than back then.

  • http://www.facebook.com/barry.stephens Barry Stephens

    There were inconsistencies with his totem that were unfair. If we're building clues to amount to something, then he denied us clues, such as “He didn't finish spinning the top after testing the Chemist's super potion.”, Leo also grabbed the totem from inside his wife's mind, so there's no guarantee that he was ever secure in the idea that he was in reality… and Leo is the audiences' totem, so I would expect some consistency. In a film like this, the inconsistencies are perceived as brilliant. But as a story, it was told improperly.
    Unless the film was from Ken Watanabe's standpoint. Then he is just pulling a “Mr. Charles” on Leo to get him to delve deeper into his mind.
    My half-wit comment was out of frustration for people are latching onto this idea too intensely and trying to read too much into it. But you don't realize that the mystery is just misdirection.

  • José

    “He didn't finish spinning the top after testing the Chemist's super potion.”
    He had just woken up from a deep disturbing dream that Yusuf's sedative sent him to. He rushed to the bathroom to make sure he wasnt dreaming and the curtains made him doubt that but i think that he was trying to maybe keep his totem a secret from Saito. But he was freaking out, and i dont think he would want the man ,who might potentially get him back to his kids, know that this projection mike f-up the whole thing. he's also keeping this from everyone else.
    and “Leo[Cobb] also grabbed the totem from inside his wife's mindso there's no guarantee that he was ever secure in the idea that he was in reality…”
    maybe you went to the restroom and missed something
    that was a memory of what happened that night. He was telling the story to Ariadne and thats how he acquired the totem.
    If youre talking about how he picks up the totem in limbo
    that was so he could convince Mal that her “world” aka limbo was not real. soooooooooo

    whatre you talkin bout dewd

  • Adam

    I stopped reading the review half way through – why ? – because I read something very similar on another site, or a paper, where the critic wanted to be different, to go against the tide – your review is so transparent and the real reasons are plainly obvious.

    This movie was fantastic, sheer entertainment, a amazing story, the characters spot on, this is Nolan's gem, the fact you thought The Prestige was a better movie is laughable, please, try and be a bit more original in future, when a movie is good, and you know its good – tell us you thought it was good and dont bow to the minority because you want to be noticed and different.

  • Idea

    u thot a lot before righting this review didnt u? u fought wid ur spouse before watching inception?i mean..look at ur taste! u find ellen page hot!(jesus alone knows from which angle!),u didnt like dark knight! and now u r saying inception is not visually appealing?! Go find another job man..dis movie thing is just not ur thing..

  • José

    ALSO
    “You've all been had. Get some standards.”

    Are you realllllllly saying “get some standards” when you've just made mention to CRANK?!?

  • http://noellesnook.blogspot.com/ Elleoneiram

    Totally agree with this review. It's nice to read something like this instead of: ” If you come out of watching Inception disappointed, then there seriously is something terribly wrong with you.” The film is indeed multilayered, and if others found hidden meaning in the film, loved the characters, and enjoyed the action, that's good for them. I tried. I really tried.

    I'm a fan of every other Christopher Nolan film I've seen. This cast includes several of my favorite actors, and is overall an extraordinarily charismatic and talented bunch. But the characters, to me, were so cliche. Cillian Murphy's character had a problem with his dad who was disappointed in him. What a novelty! (Though I thought Murphy was brilliant in this.) Eames was cheeky but tough. Arthur was cool headed and… and? I kept waiting for twists. I didn't see any. The plot was rather confusing, but that wasn't the problem for me. It was that I didn't care.

    It's obnoxious to be told that your opinion is wrong, when you can't help how you felt. I understand the urge; when I love a movie, I can't comprehend why someone else didn't. But that's what opinions are. Subjective and different.

  • http://noellesnook.blogspot.com/ Elleoneiram

    Though I had an entirely different reaction to the film, yours is one of the only comments here that acknowledges difference of opinion. I applaud you.

  • Anonymous

    I want to come in a support the writer of this article. Many of the people writing in the comments say the article is poor without telling us why, and claim that he’s only holding the viewpoint he does because he’s being ‘contrarian’ and wanting attention. They rarely take issue with the things he actually says, I suspect because they can’t. He is, after all, right.

    When the boy says “The Emperor has no clothes”, you can’t argue with him, he’s right. What you have to do is either shut the boy up, or persuade everyone else that the boy doesn’t know what he’s talking about. DO NOT LISTEN TO THE BOY, HE IS JUST SEEKING ATTENTION!

    You can see a lot of this being done in the comments. People say “This is a poorly written article! I won’t say why, that’s obvious! Don’t read it! Go away! Nothing to see here!” People say “You are just trying to be different” people say “You are just plain wrong.” None of them really back any of this up with reasoned argument. Why not, do you think?

    Let’s go through some of the comments.

    > Sorry to say, but poorly written article. “It’s a heist-type thing”, really?
    Yes, really, it is. It has all the classic heist elements including the team planning out what each of them are going to do. Are you saying it’s not a heist-type thing? Then you saw a different movie. Are you saying you don’t like his use of the phrase ‘heist -type thing?” Why? It’s accurate?

    > My different reaction to the movie isn’t why I say the article was weak, it just was
    No, you have this the wrong way around. You’re not supposed to tell us the things that weren’t causes of you thinking the article was weak, you’re supposed to tell us the things that DID make you think it was weak. I notice you don’t do that.

    > I won’t go into the numerous reasons this movie was exceptional,
    I bet you won’t. ‘Cause there aren’t any, are there? And you know it.

    > but to say it’s just another action-thriller is just plain silly.
    Let’s see, Endless gunfights? Check. Car chase? Check. Waves of ‘mooks’ trained at the Imperial Stormtrooper shooting academy? Check. Invulnerable heroic males? Check. Extended, boring homage to ‘On her Majesty’s Secret Service/Ice Station Zebra’? Check. Token female who never has a gun of her own? Check. No, I think that about settles it, it’s claiming that it’s NOT another action-thriller that’s silly.

    > This movie was an absolute Eye-Gasm
    Oh really? ‘Eye-gasm’, hmm… I must have missed something, because the only thing I saw that was really any good, was Paris folding during the extended action sequence. Everyone says this “The SFX are great! Paris folds!” yeah, what else happens? Nothing. Don’t tell me that watching a bunch of guys roll around in a hotel corridor is an ‘Eye-gasm’, it’s lame. I’ve seen mimes do this. I’ve seen ’2001 a space oddessy’.
    Are you sure you didn’t drop acid before going into the cinema?

    > that made you think at the same time.
    Oh really? What did it make you think? Only, you don’t specify, and I’d be interested to know?

    > Anyways I’d give the movie a solid 8.5 out of ten. So ya missed there
    Missed what exactly? Missed out on saying that he agrees with you? I think that’s a risk he’s prepared to take.

    > From 5 to 1. Batman Begins, The Prestige, Memento, Inception,
    > The Dark Knight…That is final.
    You are wrong. And that’s final.

    > If you didn’t like it that’s cool, but I think the reasons why are because
    > YOU didn’t get the movie YOU wanted. (Which is fair from a personal
    > stand-point, but not as a reviewer perhaps?)
    I keep coming across people asking reviewers to ascend beyond their personal stand-points. I don’t know how you would do this. If you could do this, you would surely have transcended beyond the level of mere mortals to an understanding of humanity in the whole. In that case, I don’t think you’re going to be spending your time writing movie reviews, instead you’ll be starting a religion. I don’t think the fact that the review is his opinion of why the film was disappointing for him invalidates the review, as that’s the only viewpoint that anyone can give?

    > This is a movie that’s depth explorers not only one genre, but rather
    > human emotion and thinking as a whole.
    LOL. What did it make you think? “Oh, hey dude, maybe we’re just like, dreaming, you know?” Anything more than that? If so, what? As for exploring human emotion, did that happen before or after the gunfights? I’m pretty sure it wasn’t during?

    > I would recommend you give it another try.
    No, I suspect he’s gotten all there is to get out of this one.

    > Seems you went in with some pre-conceived notions there or was just
    > determined not to like it just because.
    Seems to me that you’re determined to to believe that anyone who claims they had a different opinion of the film that you, must be lying and just saying so for effect. DO NOT LISTEN TO THE BOY! HE IS JUST SEEKING ATTENTION!

    > I’m all for respecting others opinions, but not when they’re just plain wrong.
    Well, I’ve news for you, you’re just plain wrong, so I’m giving you notice that I’m disrespecting your opinion as of now.

    > An amateur movie critic wanting to stand out by giving a bad review.
    Hello ‘Anonymous’. How do you know this, exactly, hmm? I bet you don’t know the reviewer, so how are you a judge of his character?

    > typical. never wanting to follow the crowd no matter how great a film is. grow up
    Well, I’ve news for you Anonymous, there are people who think differently to you. Sorry to break that to you so blunt, but it’s the way the world is. The fact they think differently doesn’t mean they need to ‘grow up’, and their different viewpoint could actually be right. You should know this by now, to be honest.

    > And this review didn’t give one example of why it was bad.
    Well, just to pick on one thing he said “the movie’s second half devolves into shallow action; a lot of shooting and a lot of loud music.” I’d agree with him about that. That’s a pretty clear example. You seem to have missed that, maybe you didn’t read the review closely enough?

    > It was filled with dubious ideas of why it was bad.
    I suspect those would be the examples that you are claiming aren’t there.

    > How was this just an action movie “with a couple more layers thrown in?”
    Car chases, endless gunfights, fistfights, with a load of explaining-the-plot talking scenes stuck on the front of it. This answer question?

    > How are the actors not stretching their theatrical muscles?
    There’s not one scene of decent dialogue, or one scene where I really care about anyone. This answer question?

    > first time I’ve seen Marion Cottilard as a slightly villainous character,
    > and I thought she did very well.
    She was supposed to be playing a massively villainous character, the movie’s main antagonist, and she was doing it rather badly.

    > What’s wrong with the execution of the “deep, philosophical ideas”
    Can’t really answer this one, because there aren’t any. “Hey dude, how do we know we’re not, like, dreaming, right now!” is not a deep philosophical idea.

    > This review is filled with many vague notions of why the movie is bad,
    > but no solid illustrations. If you don’t like it, be specific as to why.
    I think he’s specific enough. For instance, he points out that the second half of the movie descends into meaningless gunfights. He doesn’t actually have to say “At 82 mins in, when Eaves shoots some distant figure in the head, right there, that’s a meaningless gunfight.” It’s enough to say “The second half was a Bond rip-off” and leave it at that. When he says “The cast contains some great actors, but none of them really get to flex their theatrical muscles.”, he doesn’t have to give examples, he doesn’t have to say “In the scene where De Caprio is telling Page about the tokens, right there, I didn’t think he was being stretched.” I think you’ll find most movie reviews don’t do this.

    > it makes you sound exactly like someone who’s saying he doesn’t like it just because
    > everyone else does.
    DO NOT LISTEN TO THE BOY! THE BOY IS JUST SEEKING ATTENTION! WE, THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY ALL AGREE THAT THE EMPEROR HAS CLOTHES!

    > Wow Barry. Seriously? Did someone knock on your door and call you a half-wit because you
    > liked a movie? You can have your opinions, there’s no need to be insulting about it.
    Hello Misty, aren’t you the person who just said that Jack was only saying he doesn’t like it because he wanted to be different from everyone else? It doesn’t occur to you that that’s a hugely insulting thing to say? No? I mean it’s basically knocking on someone’s door and calling them an emotionally insecure liar because they didn’t like a movie? You are right to call Barry on this, he shouldn’t call people half-wits, but you should deal with the log in your own eye first.

    > And please, can you give me an example of a plot hole in this film?
    Actually, Misty, I’m with you on this one. I can’t think that it had any plot holes, the plot held together pretty well for me. On this point you are right to call Barry to give examples.

    > and 6. That everyone else loves it!!! That’s seriously a gripe I’ve read in a few
    > reviews. Film critics are literally resorting to the “everyone loves it so I guess I’ll
    > hate it” card.
    Hello Mr E. I’ve not seen one case of anyone making this argument? I’ve seen them saying “I don’t understand why others like it so much”, but that is different from saying “Everyone else likes this movie, so I have decided to hate it”. That would, I agree, be a very strange position to hold. But what I’ve seen instead is loads of people, like you, saying that because a majority like it, anyone who raises issues or says that the movie isn’t so good, must just be saying that for effect. This is saying that anyone who disagrees with the majority must be sick or dishonest or something. The Nazi party made this same argument, as I recall (no, I don’t literally recall, I wasn’t there, and any photos implying I was are faked!).

    > It seems as if people are searching so strongly for things to dislike about the movie
    > that they’re arguing with themselves.
    I’ve not seen this either, but I would seriously like to. People arguing with themselves sounds like a scream, please give pointers to this, and it sounds very entertaining!

    > The truth is that the films pacing is spot on.
    I agree with you about that, Mr E, the pacing is good. I don’t think it was too slow.

    > 5. Characters aren’t developed enough….usually in the same article where the acting is
    > applauded
    Mr E, I strongly agree with point 5 in your list, the characters aren’t developed enough. The reason why people say this and then say the acting was good is because they see that the cast are struggling heroically to make a lot out of very little, and I would say that was fair comment. Consider, for instance, Cillian Murphy playing Fischer. He doesn’t get much screen-time, but I felt that Murphy did a good job of making us connect to the character despite that. So, now you should see why this seeming ‘paradox’ of people saying the characters are underdeveloped, but well acted, occurs.

    > The beauty about this film is that it is EXTREMELY complex,
    Really? Let’s see:
    ————————– WARNING SPOILERS ——————————
    The team has a means of entering people’s dreams and stealing information from them. Saito offers them a job to do the opposite, to put information into someone’s mind. Cobb knows this can be done, because once, when he and his wife became ‘trapped’ in a dream because she didn’t want to leave it, believing it was real, he snapped her out of the dream by inserting the suggestion that actually the world she was in wasn’t real. However, she then began to doubt the ‘real’ world to (or what Cobb takes to be the real world). The team take the job, and descend through multiple ‘dream layers’, time running faster in each one. They have to use multiple layers of dreaming to bury the idea deep, and they have to find some way of presenting the idea to the subject (Fisher) as though it were a natural product of his own mind. Loads of shooting happens, there is a car case, a fight in a hotel, and an attack on ‘Ice Station Zebra’. Finally Fischer dreams a last meeting with his father, in which ideas implanted earlier by one of the team pretending to be Fisher’s business associate lead him to conclude that he must break up his father’s business empire.
    ————————– WARNING SPOILERS ——————————

    There’s some great ideas in there, but I wouldn’t say it was massively complex. I mean, it was easy to write a synopsis without it becoming an essay?

    > In a way seems biased to me, but whatever, it’s your opinion.
    Justin, in what way does it seem biased? You can’t just make the accusation without backup?

    > I don’t think I’ve ever gotten the chills as many times as I did watching that movie.
    That’s interesting, because I didn’t get them once. Maybe that’s because, when I’m told we’re entering someone’s dreams, I think of my own dreams, and they’re a lot scarier than ‘Inception’ ever was.

    > anyways, in my opinion it was a great movie, but we all have different
    > opinions I guess, so it’s all good.
    Justin, I couldn’t agree more. I’m just here to defend Jack’s (and my) right to have a different opinion, because many people in these comments, and many other places, are saying that we shouldn’t. They say there must be something wrong with us (presuably something that need ‘curing’). They say our opinions are false, that we are just claiming them for ‘effect’. They say we must be stupid, or bad people, or something. We’re not, and our opinion is just as vaild as theirs.

    > BTW…Ellen Page is NOT HOT!!!
    Thanks for sharing that with us Mr E.

    > There were inconsistencies with his totem that were unfair.
    I must admit Barry, that I don’t see this. I couldn’t quite follow what you were saying in your post (it was, perhaps, more difficult to follow than the movie!).

    > My half-wit comment was out of frustration
    I can understand this, but it’s best not to let it get the better of you. I applaud you for realising that this is what happened though, many people would not have come back and admitted this, and it’s good that you have.

    > I stopped reading the review half way through – why ? – because I read something very
    > similar on another site, or a paper, where the critic wanted to be different, to go
    > against the tide – your review is so transparent and the real reasons are plainly
    > obvious.
    “I stopped reading the review half-way through -why? – because the idea that someone might have a different opinion to mine scares me deeply. I mean, what if they were right? I read something very similar on a different site… or maybe in the paper… or maybe on TV? Unless I dreamed it? But anyway, I’ve got this mantra to deal with situations like this: DO NOT LISTEN TO THE BOY, HIS REASONS FOR SPEAKING UP ARE TRANSPARENT AND PLAINLY OBVIOUS!

    > This movie was fantastic,
    Nope, not close.

    > sheer entertainment,
    It was quite enjoyable, that I admit. But there are a lot of ‘quite enjoyable’ movies around.

    > a amazing story,
    Nope, good ideas, but they don’t translate into a great story I’m afraid.

    > the characters spot on,
    What characters?

    > this is Nolan’s gem, the fact you thought The Prestige was a better movie is laughable,
    The Prestige is a better movie.

    > please, try and be a bit more original in future,
    You say ‘be more original’ but in the next line you’ll accuse him of ‘bowing to the minority’ instead of supporting the majority viewpoint. I would say that, if he’s pushing a minority viewpoint, then surely he is being original, hmm?

    > when a movie is good, and you know its good
    Yes, and when a movie is half-baked, doesn’t live up to its pitch, and has an extended Bond homage in it, you know that too. I know, and you know I know, that Inception just ain’t that good.

    > tell us you thought it was good
    But he didn’t think it was good? You are asking him to lie now?

    > and dont bow to the minority because you want to be noticed and different.
    DO NOT LISTEN TO THE BOY! HE JUST WANTS TO BE NOTICED AND DIFFERENT! THE EMPEROR HAS CLOTHES!

    > u thot a lot before righting this review didnt u?
    Oh… my… god.

    >u fought wid ur spouse before watching inception?
    I fink h3 m@y hv thot more than u. H3 uses long wordz n stuff.

    > i mean..look at ur taste! u find ellen page hot!(jesus alone knows from which angle!),
    I mean, look at your typing! I find it interesting that, in parentheses, your spelling and grammar suddenly improves.

    > u didnt like dark knight!
    My god, if he didn’t like the Dark Knight he must be insane or rabid or something. Why, he’s probably Hitler.

    > and now u r saying inception is not visually appealing?!
    Well, it’s not all that, is it? Not in this day and age? I mean, the Paris thing was cool, but after that there’s really not very much? “Ice Station Zebra” was not visually appealing, nor was a hotel, nor a car chase. As you point out, even Ms Page isn’t *that* visually appealing, being apparently fourteen.

    > Go find another job man..dis movie thing is just not ur thing..
    I think he should keep his job, after all, we don’t need legions of critics who agree with each other, we need the guys (and gals) who say what they think, and have a different angle. He’s done that. That’s what his job is, it’s not his job to agree with you that ‘Inc3pt10n iz da b0mb!’, I’m afraid.

    > Totally agree with this review. It’s nice to read something like this instead of: ” If
    > you come out of watching Inception disappointed, then there seriously is something
    > terribly wrong with you.”
    Sir (or Madam), let me shake your hand! I’m glad to see there are more of us prepared to stand up to this, frankly communistic, ‘Inception’ groupthink! They will tell us we are wrong, sick, disingenuous, they will try to drown out our voices, but we will shout it from the rooftops, “This is the free world and we have a right to our opinions! THE EMPEROR WEARS NO CLOTHES”

    > It’s obnoxious to be told that your opinion is wrong, when you can’t help how you felt.
    Obnoxious and sinister too, don’t you think?

    So, anyways, I want to applaud Jack for having the bravery to say what he thinks, when it seems the majority would rather squish any opposing viewpoints to the ‘official party line’. Funnily enough, he can’t be too wrong, or sick, or seeking attention, because most of the things he says are exactly the same things that I had problems with in this movie. When someone promises me that we are going on a ride into someone’s subconcious, I expect to get more than a car-chase and Ice Station Zebra. When people tell me that a film has philosophical depth, I expect more than the kind of “What if we’re dreaming?” stoner philosophy that I indulged in a school. When someone tells me it’s an “Eye-gasm”, I expect more than a couple of scenes of a city folding over and fruit-stalls exploding. This is a good, perfectly enjoyable, dumb-ass movie. It’s not much more. The rest, I would say, is hype. Everyone says that it makes you think, but no-one says what it is that they think. Everyone says that it’s complex, but a lot of people seem to have no problem squashing it into a one-paragraph synopsis. This film doesn’t deliver what it claims to, it’s just hype.

    And no, I’m not saying that to be different or ‘stand out’. That’s what I think.