Quantum Of Solace Reviews

by Liam on October 19, 2008 · Comments

The reviews are pouring in for Quantum of Solace, and here is a run-down of what most of them are saying:

BBC

It’s a film that feels like the second part of a trilogy, with this being the bleaker second act.

For a lot of the movie Bond is a particularly unsympathetic character, and often it’s only Craig’s performance along with the shifting morality of Bond’s legion of enemies that forces the audience to root for him.

Empire 4/5 Stars

A pacy, visually imaginative follow-up. If it doesn’t even try to be bigger than Casino Royale, that’s perhaps a smart move in that there’s still a sense at the end that Bond’s mission has barely begun and he’ll need a few more movies to work his way up to destroying the apparently undefeatable Quantum organisation. The only real caveat is that while it’s exciting, it’s not exactly anyone’s idea of fun. To keep in the game, perhaps the next movie could let the hero enjoy himself a bit more.

Totalfilm 3/5 stars

The action is loud and proud, but the story feels disjointed and muddled, with some uneven flecks of comedy. Still, Craig’s presence keeps the edges from fraying too far and Forster just about nails the extra levels or artsiness and melancholy.

Times Online 4/5 Stars

The director, Marc Forster, has absorbed the lucrative lessons discovered in Martin Campbell’s Casino Royale. He has also managed to pace his sequel much better. Royale felt slightly wheel-clamped by one too many longeurs. If anything, the crunching chase sequences in Quantum of Solace are even more magnificently dangerous. And the daredevil leaps and tumbles through glass roofs are just as sensational as the splintering high-speed pyrotechnics.

But it’s the amount of heartache and punishment that Craig’s new Bond absorbs that makes him look so right for our times.

Bond is no longer a work in progress. He is now the cruel, finished article.

The Independent 3/5 stars

Quantum Of Solace doesn’t seem like a major entry in the Bond canon. Well under two hours long, it’s shorter and more frenetic than most of its predecessors, and an often-jolting experience to watch. Loose ends about. What it does have, though, above all, is vigour. The franchise hasn’t run out of juice quite yet.

The Guardian 3/5 stars

Quantum of Solace isn’t as good as Casino Royale: the smart elegance of Craig’s Bond debut has been toned down in favour of conventional action. But the man himself powers this movie; he carries the film: it’s an indefinably difficult task for an actor. Craig measures up.

And while were all ‘Bonded up’ here is an 1 minute long TV spot that is currently being shown on UK TV.

Bookmark and Share



  • James Bottled in Bond
    I think the name sucks! What in Bond's name does Quantum of Solace mean? I long for the Goldfinger days or Doctor No. Stop trying to be cool or cooler than the last and simply name the movies without having to be a graduate of Cambridge University to decipher them.
  • hmm
    Whatever happened to Q and the cool gadgets Bond would get and the humour? Where's the villian's bleeding eyes or funny looking teeth/bullet lodged in his brain? Where's the intense scene where our hero gets captured and tortured and the villian reveals his plan to our hero? The introduction music was weak, and the car chase seemed like it was a bad version of bourne identity, the only thing that saved this movie was Daniel Craig as Bond. I would say this is one of the worst Bonds to date. Golden Eye with Pierce, was much more epic and a real spy/bond style movie, Casino Royale was a much better movie/storyline. Quantum of Solace is like Casino Royale 1.5, almost like an after thought project and not a movie. The next James Bond Movie better have sexier cars, gambling action, gadgets, product placements, submarines, tanks, rocket launchers and music. They didn't even play the theme song during any action sequences. 2/5
  • Disappointed with Quantum of S
    Just came from watching Quantum of Solace with my wife. Can't be good when you reach your car and others are standing outside their car complaining. What about you say? Disappointment. Like when Bond and M have to stop to tie the story together with some narrative. Whatever happened to watching a James Bond movie and understanding what is going on by simply watching the actors act. How about holding the camera still when there is an action sequence. Like stopping the jerky camera action. This not a movie I want to see over and over. I think that is the gauge of a good James Bond movie. Hey, that is the gauge of any good movie. I base my decision to purchase a DVD (now Blu-Ray) movie on the basis of do I want to see a movie more than once. I have no desire to ever see this movie again. Hey Barbara, that should be your litmus test. Ask yourself before making a movie like this again. Would the average moviegoer want to watch your movie more than once or buy a DVD (or Blu-Ray)to watch the movie more than once. If it can't pass that test, don't make it - go back to the drawing board. Lastly, you don't have the good guy (Bond)use his friend's still beating body as a bullit shield and then have Bond dump his body in a dumpster. Bad form as the British would say. Totally out of character. You should listen to Roger Moore's opinion next time.
  • Best of the best alo james girl looks fantastic
  • S L
    Quantum's edit was too frenetic...particularly in the beginning.
    Daniel Craig is gorgeous, mysterious, fascinating and modern. I LOVE his James Bond. I'll go to all future James Bond films if he's playing the role.
  • missing_gadgets
    The production company must have spent a fortune in post with that editing. The action scenes were chopped, hacked then superglue'd back together like a mosaic of pyrotechnics. Where are the gadgets? the weapons? the cars? and most importantly where the heck were the love scenes? This is the most disappointing Bond film yet.
  • alexandra
    grate movie
  • Sylvie
    Quantum of Solace is the title of a short story by Ian Fleming. The film bears absolutely no resemblance to the short story. It *is* very difficult to understand why the choice of title as once it has been removed from the short story it does become incomprehensible. The short story is worth reading for its own sake but it is not like Ian Fleming's other Bond writing.
blog comments powered by Disqus