<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: New Star Trek Images!</title> <atom:link href="http://filmonic.com/new-star-trek-images/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://filmonic.com/new-star-trek-images</link> <description>Movie news, trailers, reviews and release dates</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: John Bailey</title><link>http://filmonic.com/new-star-trek-images/comment-page-1#comment-7921</link> <dc:creator>John Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 21:56:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=2982#comment-7921</guid> <description>I agree with this.Its clear that the first six Star Trek films in the late 1970&#039;s - 1980&#039;s deliberately ignored the fact that Yeoman Rand and Nurse Chapel were characters as equally important as the others. And its true that Grace Lee Whitney was assaulted then fired as a cover up. Its also clear that her character was originally the fourth in importance. They should be in the film. And Lieutenant Kyle - he was the posh sounding englishman, wasn&#039;t he. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this.Its clear that the first six Star Trek films in the late 1970&#039;s &#8211; 1980&#039;s deliberately ignored the fact that Yeoman Rand and Nurse Chapel were characters as equally important as the others. And its true that Grace Lee Whitney was assaulted then fired as a cover up. Its also clear that her character was originally the fourth in importance. They should be in the film. And Lieutenant Kyle &#8211; he was the posh sounding englishman, wasn&#039;t he.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John Bailey</title><link>http://filmonic.com/new-star-trek-images/comment-page-1#comment-15321</link> <dc:creator>John Bailey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=2982#comment-15321</guid> <description>I agree with this.Its clear that the first six Star Trek films in the late 1970&#039;s - 1980&#039;s deliberately ignored the fact that Yeoman Rand and Nurse Chapel were characters as equally important as the others. And its true that Grace Lee Whitney was assaulted then fired as a cover up. Its also clear that her character was originally the fourth in importance. They should be in the film. And Lieutenant Kyle - he was the posh sounding englishman, wasn&#039;t he.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with this.Its clear that the first six Star Trek films in the late 1970&#039;s &#8211; 1980&#039;s deliberately ignored the fact that Yeoman Rand and Nurse Chapel were characters as equally important as the others. And its true that Grace Lee Whitney was assaulted then fired as a cover up. Its also clear that her character was originally the fourth in importance. They should be in the film. And Lieutenant Kyle &#8211; he was the posh sounding englishman, wasn&#039;t he.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ian fishwick</title><link>http://filmonic.com/new-star-trek-images/comment-page-1#comment-7920</link> <dc:creator>ian fishwick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 21:44:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=2982#comment-7920</guid> <description>I agree. It&#039;s ridiculous that Yeoman Rand and Nurse Chapel are not in - and also Lieutenant Kyle. I Grace Lee Whitney had not been sexually assaulted and subsequently fired back in 1966 her character would have still been the FOURTH most important in the franchise. The latest producers should be ashamed to be going along with this party line. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. It&#039;s ridiculous that Yeoman Rand and Nurse Chapel are not in &#8211; and also Lieutenant Kyle. I Grace Lee Whitney had not been sexually assaulted and subsequently fired back in 1966 her character would have still been the FOURTH most important in the franchise. The latest producers should be ashamed to be going along with this party line.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ian fishwick</title><link>http://filmonic.com/new-star-trek-images/comment-page-1#comment-15320</link> <dc:creator>ian fishwick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=2982#comment-15320</guid> <description>I agree. It&#039;s ridiculous that Yeoman Rand and Nurse Chapel are not in - and also Lieutenant Kyle. I Grace Lee Whitney had not been sexually assaulted and subsequently fired back in 1966 her character would have still been the FOURTH most important in the franchise. The latest producers should be ashamed to be going along with this party line.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. It&#039;s ridiculous that Yeoman Rand and Nurse Chapel are not in &#8211; and also Lieutenant Kyle. I Grace Lee Whitney had not been sexually assaulted and subsequently fired back in 1966 her character would have still been the FOURTH most important in the franchise. The latest producers should be ashamed to be going along with this party line.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: itsalljustaride</title><link>http://filmonic.com/new-star-trek-images/comment-page-1#comment-3841</link> <dc:creator>itsalljustaride</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:04:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=2982#comment-3841</guid> <description>I have grave doubts about this film. The Trek franchise took a steep nose-dive around the time of Voyager. I guess they&#039;re trying to revive it by going back to familiar characters, but it just doesn&#039;t look right. these actors look like they should be on the Disney Channel or Heroes, not Star Trek.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have grave doubts about this film. The Trek franchise took a steep nose-dive around the time of Voyager. I guess they&#8217;re trying to revive it by going back to familiar characters, but it just doesn&#8217;t look right. these actors look like they should be on the Disney Channel or Heroes, not Star Trek.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: itsalljustaride</title><link>http://filmonic.com/new-star-trek-images/comment-page-1#comment-15319</link> <dc:creator>itsalljustaride</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=2982#comment-15319</guid> <description>I have grave doubts about this film. The Trek franchise took a steep nose-dive around the time of Voyager. I guess they&#039;re trying to revive it by going back to familiar characters, but it just doesn&#039;t look right. these actors look like they should be on the Disney Channel or Heroes, not Star Trek.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have grave doubts about this film. The Trek franchise took a steep nose-dive around the time of Voyager. I guess they&#8217;re trying to revive it by going back to familiar characters, but it just doesn&#8217;t look right. these actors look like they should be on the Disney Channel or Heroes, not Star Trek.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: italkfilm</title><link>http://filmonic.com/new-star-trek-images/comment-page-1#comment-3832</link> <dc:creator>italkfilm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 08:36:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=2982#comment-3832</guid> <description>I hope they do justice to Star Trek. Can&#039;t wait to see it .</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they do justice to Star Trek. Can&#8217;t wait to see it .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: italkfilm</title><link>http://filmonic.com/new-star-trek-images/comment-page-1#comment-15318</link> <dc:creator>italkfilm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 08:36:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=2982#comment-15318</guid> <description>I hope they do justice to Star Trek. Can&#039;t wait to see it .</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they do justice to Star Trek. Can&#8217;t wait to see it .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Darkhorse</title><link>http://filmonic.com/new-star-trek-images/comment-page-1#comment-3590</link> <dc:creator>Darkhorse</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:16:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=2982#comment-3590</guid> <description>Grace Lee Whitney may have had very small parts in the final cuts of these films, but she was nevertheless a character: ST:The Motion Picture as CPO Janice Rand; ST III: The Search for Spock; ST IV: The Voyage Home as Commander Janice Rand; and ST VI: The Undiscovered Country again as Commander Rand.  In fact, although Walter Koenig was definitely a bigger star in the series as Checkov, you could say Whitney outlasted him because she was present on Captain Sulu&#039;s USS Excelsior in the excellent 1996 episode of Voyager entitled &quot;Flashback.&quot;  I believe she might have been Captain Sulu&#039;s first officer, although her screen time was minimal.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grace Lee Whitney may have had very small parts in the final cuts of these films, but she was nevertheless a character: ST:The Motion Picture as CPO Janice Rand; ST III: The Search for Spock; ST IV: The Voyage Home as Commander Janice Rand; and ST VI: The Undiscovered Country again as Commander Rand.  In fact, although Walter Koenig was definitely a bigger star in the series as Checkov, you could say Whitney outlasted him because she was present on Captain Sulu&#8217;s USS Excelsior in the excellent 1996 episode of Voyager entitled &#8220;Flashback.&#8221;  I believe she might have been Captain Sulu&#8217;s first officer, although her screen time was minimal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Darkhorse</title><link>http://filmonic.com/new-star-trek-images/comment-page-1#comment-15317</link> <dc:creator>Darkhorse</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=2982#comment-15317</guid> <description>Grace Lee Whitney may have had very small parts in the final cuts of these films, but she was nevertheless a character: ST:The Motion Picture as CPO Janice Rand; ST III: The Search for Spock; ST IV: The Voyage Home as Commander Janice Rand; and ST VI: The Undiscovered Country again as Commander Rand.  In fact, although Walter Koenig was definitely a bigger star in the series as Checkov, you could say Whitney outlasted him because she was present on Captain Sulu&#039;s USS Excelsior in the excellent 1996 episode of Voyager entitled &quot;Flashback.&quot;  I believe she might have been Captain Sulu&#039;s first officer, although her screen time was minimal.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grace Lee Whitney may have had very small parts in the final cuts of these films, but she was nevertheless a character: ST:The Motion Picture as CPO Janice Rand; ST III: The Search for Spock; ST IV: The Voyage Home as Commander Janice Rand; and ST VI: The Undiscovered Country again as Commander Rand.  In fact, although Walter Koenig was definitely a bigger star in the series as Checkov, you could say Whitney outlasted him because she was present on Captain Sulu&#8217;s USS Excelsior in the excellent 1996 episode of Voyager entitled &#8220;Flashback.&#8221;  I believe she might have been Captain Sulu&#8217;s first officer, although her screen time was minimal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 6/20 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk
Object Caching 418/426 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via fcdn.filmonic.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: filmonic.com @ 2012-05-26 08:07:11 -->
