<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Here&#8217;s a new Sherlock Holmes poster</title> <atom:link href="http://filmonic.com/heres-a-new-sherlock-holmes-poster-560/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://filmonic.com/heres-a-new-sherlock-holmes-poster-560</link> <description>Movie news, trailers, reviews and release dates</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: cheap r4 dsi</title><link>http://filmonic.com/heres-a-new-sherlock-holmes-poster-560/comment-page-1#comment-11998</link> <dc:creator>cheap r4 dsi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:07:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=7882#comment-11998</guid> <description>The casting appears to be atrocious. The take on the Holmesian premise may be worse than the casting. Jude Law could possibly have been a traditional Holmes. Conan Doyles&#039; original stories and portrayals were so absolutely engrossing any attempt to jazz (trash) them up is ridiculous. Holmes fans will be sickened by this and non-Holmes fans simply won&#039;t show. What could possibly have been better than a properly cast and faithfully portrayed A Study In Scarlet or The Sign of Four? I won&#039;t waste my money on this outrage at the theatre, nor rent the dvd when it comes out.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The casting appears to be atrocious. The take on the Holmesian premise may be worse than the casting. Jude Law could possibly have been a traditional Holmes. Conan Doyles&#39; original stories and portrayals were so absolutely engrossing any attempt to jazz (trash) them up is ridiculous. Holmes fans will be sickened by this and non-Holmes fans simply won&#39;t show. What could possibly have been better than a properly cast and faithfully portrayed A Study In Scarlet or The Sign of Four? I won&#39;t waste my money on this outrage at the theatre, nor rent the dvd when it comes out.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: walkerswis</title><link>http://filmonic.com/heres-a-new-sherlock-holmes-poster-560/comment-page-1#comment-11609</link> <dc:creator>walkerswis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:05:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=7882#comment-11609</guid> <description>Just saw the movie.  Incredibily entertaining, great story line, great visual.  We loved it!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw the movie.  Incredibily entertaining, great story line, great visual.  We loved it!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: annonymous14</title><link>http://filmonic.com/heres-a-new-sherlock-holmes-poster-560/comment-page-1#comment-10748</link> <dc:creator>annonymous14</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:22:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=7882#comment-10748</guid> <description>I think Robert makes a great Sherlock Holmes! The poster looks fantastic! Love the look and feel of it! Can&#039;t wait until Christmas!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Robert makes a great Sherlock Holmes! The poster looks fantastic! Love the look and feel of it! Can&#39;t wait until Christmas!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: terry</title><link>http://filmonic.com/heres-a-new-sherlock-holmes-poster-560/comment-page-1#comment-10747</link> <dc:creator>terry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:53:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=7882#comment-10747</guid> <description>RDJ looks like Dr Who instead of sherlock holmes</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RDJ looks like Dr Who instead of sherlock holmes</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: annonymous14</title><link>http://filmonic.com/heres-a-new-sherlock-holmes-poster-560/comment-page-1#comment-10346</link> <dc:creator>annonymous14</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:22:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=7882#comment-10346</guid> <description>I think Robert makes a great Sherlock Holmes! The poster looks fantastic! Love the look and feel of it! Can&#039;t wait until Christmas!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Robert makes a great Sherlock Holmes! The poster looks fantastic! Love the look and feel of it! Can&#39;t wait until Christmas!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: terry</title><link>http://filmonic.com/heres-a-new-sherlock-holmes-poster-560/comment-page-1#comment-10345</link> <dc:creator>terry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:53:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=7882#comment-10345</guid> <description>RDJ looks like Dr Who instead of sherlock holmes</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RDJ looks like Dr Who instead of sherlock holmes</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/13 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk
Object Caching 319/323 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via fcdn.filmonic.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: filmonic.com @ 2012-02-13 18:59:44 -->
