<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: G.I. Joe 2 will soon go into development</title> <atom:link href="http://filmonic.com/g-i-joe-2-development/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://filmonic.com/g-i-joe-2-development</link> <description>Movie news, trailers, reviews and release dates</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: terry</title><link>http://filmonic.com/g-i-joe-2-development/comment-page-1#comment-10970</link> <dc:creator>terry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:33:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=7306#comment-10970</guid> <description>i agree this movie was bad but Marlon Wayans was really entertaining he felt more like the lead of the movie instead of Channing Tatum.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree this movie was bad but Marlon Wayans was really entertaining he felt more like the lead of the movie instead of Channing Tatum.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: vcurtz</title><link>http://filmonic.com/g-i-joe-2-development/comment-page-1#comment-10969</link> <dc:creator>vcurtz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:54:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=7306#comment-10969</guid> <description>Oy.  This movie could&#039;ve been AMAZING, too.  Definitly had potential. o_o  Oh well. &lt;br&gt;Even my dumb guy friends who think every movie is good thought this movie was bad.  It seems everyone had such high hopes for it, that they have to see it to believe it. Not looking forward to the second installment, won&#039;t bother to go see it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oy.  This movie could&#39;ve been AMAZING, too.  Definitly had potential. o_o  Oh well. <br />Even my dumb guy friends who think every movie is good thought this movie was bad.  It seems everyone had such high hopes for it, that they have to see it to believe it. Not looking forward to the second installment, won&#39;t bother to go see it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steevoger</title><link>http://filmonic.com/g-i-joe-2-development/comment-page-1#comment-10968</link> <dc:creator>Steevoger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:23:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=7306#comment-10968</guid> <description>starts tomorrow here in Germany...don&#039;t expect much...if i go in and come out entertained then its all I expected and that would be ok with me...thats just the usual way of a Stephen Sommers movie.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>starts tomorrow here in Germany&#8230;don&#39;t expect much&#8230;if i go in and come out entertained then its all I expected and that would be ok with me&#8230;thats just the usual way of a Stephen Sommers movie.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: terry</title><link>http://filmonic.com/g-i-joe-2-development/comment-page-1#comment-9809</link> <dc:creator>terry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:33:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=7306#comment-9809</guid> <description>i agree this movie was bad but Marlon Wayans was really entertaining he felt more like the lead of the movie instead of Channing Tatum.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree this movie was bad but Marlon Wayans was really entertaining he felt more like the lead of the movie instead of Channing Tatum.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: vcurtz</title><link>http://filmonic.com/g-i-joe-2-development/comment-page-1#comment-9807</link> <dc:creator>vcurtz</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:54:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=7306#comment-9807</guid> <description>Oy.  This movie could&#039;ve been AMAZING, too.  Definitly had potential. o_o  Oh well. &lt;br&gt;Even my dumb guy friends who think every movie is good thought this movie was bad.  It seems everyone had such high hopes for it, that they have to see it to believe it. Not looking forward to the second installment, won&#039;t bother to go see it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oy.  This movie could&#39;ve been AMAZING, too.  Definitly had potential. o_o  Oh well. <br />Even my dumb guy friends who think every movie is good thought this movie was bad.  It seems everyone had such high hopes for it, that they have to see it to believe it. Not looking forward to the second installment, won&#39;t bother to go see it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steevoger</title><link>http://filmonic.com/g-i-joe-2-development/comment-page-1#comment-9806</link> <dc:creator>Steevoger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:23:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=7306#comment-9806</guid> <description>starts tomorrow here in Germany...don&#039;t expect much...if i go in and come out entertained then its all I expected and that would be ok with me...thats just the usual way of a Stephen Sommers movie.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>starts tomorrow here in Germany&#8230;don&#39;t expect much&#8230;if i go in and come out entertained then its all I expected and that would be ok with me&#8230;thats just the usual way of a Stephen Sommers movie.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/13 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk
Object Caching 319/323 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via fcdn.filmonic.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: filmonic.com @ 2012-02-13 16:35:22 -->
