<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Dark Knight Returns</title> <atom:link href="http://filmonic.com/dark-knight-returns/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://filmonic.com/dark-knight-returns</link> <description>Movie news, trailers, reviews and release dates</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ebo</title><link>http://filmonic.com/dark-knight-returns/comment-page-1#comment-11018</link> <dc:creator>Ebo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:38:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=2641#comment-11018</guid> <description>Pushing for an Oscar? How about pushing it to beat that 11 year old record held by Titanic in the US.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pushing for an Oscar? How about pushing it to beat that 11 year old record held by Titanic in the US.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Midnight</title><link>http://filmonic.com/dark-knight-returns/comment-page-1#comment-11017</link> <dc:creator>Michael Midnight</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:54:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=2641#comment-11017</guid> <description>Now this is cool.  I hadn&#039;t thought about why they wanted to re-release it, other than hopefully topping &quot;Titanic&quot; but it makes perfect sense.  An Oscar push.  I wonder if people would be down to seeing a double featuring with &quot;Batman Begins&quot; and &quot;The Dark Knight&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is cool.  I hadn&#39;t thought about why they wanted to re-release it, other than hopefully topping &#8220;Titanic&#8221; but it makes perfect sense.  An Oscar push.  I wonder if people would be down to seeing a double featuring with &#8220;Batman Begins&#8221; and &#8220;The Dark Knight&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ebo</title><link>http://filmonic.com/dark-knight-returns/comment-page-1#comment-9045</link> <dc:creator>Ebo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:38:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=2641#comment-9045</guid> <description>Pushing for an Oscar? How about pushing it to beat that 11 year old record held by Titanic in the US.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pushing for an Oscar? How about pushing it to beat that 11 year old record held by Titanic in the US.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Midnight</title><link>http://filmonic.com/dark-knight-returns/comment-page-1#comment-9044</link> <dc:creator>Michael Midnight</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:54:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmonic.com/?p=2641#comment-9044</guid> <description>Now this is cool.  I hadn&#039;t thought about why they wanted to re-release it, other than hopefully topping &quot;Titanic&quot; but it makes perfect sense.  An Oscar push.  I wonder if people would be down to seeing a double featuring with &quot;Batman Begins&quot; and &quot;The Dark Knight&quot;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is cool.  I hadn&#39;t thought about why they wanted to re-release it, other than hopefully topping &#8220;Titanic&#8221; but it makes perfect sense.  An Oscar push.  I wonder if people would be down to seeing a double featuring with &#8220;Batman Begins&#8221; and &#8220;The Dark Knight&#8221;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/11 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk
Object Caching 285/289 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via fcdn.filmonic.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: filmonic.com @ 2012-02-13 15:09:28 -->
